» Articles » PMID: 18647257

The Potential Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Pharmacogenomic Approaches to EGFR-tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Journal Value Health
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2008 Jul 24
PMID 18647257
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Pharmacogenomic applications in oncology offer significant promise, but the clinical and economic implications remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential cost-utility of implementing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing before initiating second-line therapy for advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate the cost-utility of EGFR protein expression or gene copy number testing compared to standard care with erlotinib in refractory advanced NSCLC patients. Costs and utilities were obtained from publicly available sources. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in the results.

Results: The quality-adjusted life expectancies for erlotinib, EGFR protein expression testing, and gene copy number testing were: 0.44, 0.48, and 0.50 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); and the costs were: $57,238, $63,512, and $66,447, respectively. The most cost-effective testing option, EGFR gene copy number testing, produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $162,018/QALY compared to no testing (erlotinib). The results were most sensitive to the survival estimates, health state utilities, and cost of disease progression. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, erlotinib without testing was the optimal treatment strategy until the $150,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, after which gene copy testing was optimal. The discounted expected value of perfect information at a $100,000/QALY threshold in the USA over 5 years was $31.4 million.

Conclusions: The study results suggest that EGFR pharmacogenomic testing has the potential to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy in the treatment of refractory NSCLC by a clinically meaningful margin at a value commensurate with the approved therapies in this setting. Additional research in this area is warranted.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of precision diagnostic testing for precision medicine approaches against non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

Henderson R, Keeling P, French D, Smart D, Sullivan R, Lawler M Mol Oncol. 2021; 15(10):2672-2687.

PMID: 34110679 PMC: 8486593. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13038.


Economic Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cancer Drugs with Clinically Relevant Drug-Gene Associations: A Systematic Literature Review.

Faruque F, Noh H, Hussain A, Neuberger E, Onukwugha E J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019; 25(2):260-271.

PMID: 30698084 PMC: 7397474. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.260.


Budget Impact Analysis of Afatinib for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 19 Deletions or Exon 21 Substitution Mutations in a U.S. Health Plan.

Graham J, Earnshaw S, Burslem K, Lim J J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018; 24(6):544-553.

PMID: 29799327 PMC: 10397768. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.544.


OPTIMAL and ENSURE trials-based combined cost-effectiveness analysis of erlotinib versus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Wen F, Zheng H, Zhang P, Hutton D, Li Q BMJ Open. 2018; 8(4):e020128.

PMID: 29654023 PMC: 5905764. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020128.


Personalized Medicine and Pay for Performance: Should Pharmaceutical Firms be Fully Penalized when Treatment Fails?.

Antonanzas F, Rodriguez-Ibeas R, Juarez-Castello C Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36(7):733-743.

PMID: 29450830 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0619-4.