» Articles » PMID: 27406232

Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomic and Pharmacogenetic Test-Guided Personalized Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Approved Active Substances for Personalized Medicine in Germany

Overview
Journal Adv Ther
Date 2016 Jul 14
PMID 27406232
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of targeted therapies has recently increased. Pharmacogenetic tests are a useful tool to guide patient treatment and to test a response before administering medicines. Pharmacogenetic tests can predict potential drug resistance and may be used for determining genotype-based drug dosage. However, their cost-effectiveness as a diagnostic tool is often debatable. In Germany, 47 active ingredients are currently approved. A prior predictive test is required for 39 of these and is recommended for eight. The objective of this study was to review the cost-effectiveness (CE) of pharmacogenetic test-guided drug therapy and compare the application of drugs with and without prior genetic testing.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the CE and cost-utility of genetic tests. Studies from January 2000 until November 2015 were searched in 16 databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. A quality assessment of the full-text publications was performed using the validated Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument.

Results: In the majority of the included studies, the pharmacogenetic test-guided therapy represents a cost-effective/cost-saving treatment option. Only seven studies lacked a clear statement of CE or cost-savings, because of uncertainty, restriction to specific patient populations, or assumptions for comparative therapy. Moreover, the high quality of the available evidence was evaluated.

Conclusion: Pharmacogenetic testing constitutes an opportunity to improve the CE of pharmacotherapy. The CE of targeted therapies depends on various factors including costs, prevalence of biomarkers, and test sensitivity and specificity. To guarantee the CE comparability of stratified drug therapies, national and international standards for evaluation studies should be defined.

Citing Articles

An Assessment of the Knowledge and Perceptions of Precision Medicine (PM) in the Rwandan Healthcare Setting.

Musanabaganwa C, Ruton H, Ruhangaza D, Nsabimana N, Kayitare E, Muvunyi T J Pers Med. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38138934 PMC: 10744509. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121707.


Mental Health Prescribers' Perceptions on the Use of Pharmacogenetic Testing in the Management of Depression in the Middle East and North Africa Region.

Aboelbaha S, Zolezzi M, Abdallah O, Eltorki Y Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023; 16:503-518.

PMID: 37274729 PMC: 10239256. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S410240.


Assessing the cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen W, Anothaisintawee T, Butani D, Wang Y, Zemlyanska Y, Wong C BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e057537.

PMID: 35383079 PMC: 8984003. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057537.


Pharmacogenomics Implementation and Hurdles to Overcome; In the Context of a Developing Country.

Ayati N, Afzali M, Hasanzad M, Kebriaeezadeh A, Rajabzadeh A, Nikfar S Iran J Pharm Res. 2022; 20(4):92-106.

PMID: 35194431 PMC: 8842599. DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2021.114899.15091.


Economic Impact of the Application of a Precision Medicine Model (5SPM) on Psychotic Patients.

Carrascal-Laso L, Franco-Martin M, Marcos-Vadillo E, Ramos-Gallego I, Garcia-Berrocal B, Mayor-Toranzo E Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2021; 14:1015-1025.

PMID: 34429634 PMC: 8379643. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S320816.


References
1.
McKinnon R, Ward M, Sorich M . A critical analysis of barriers to the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008; 3(5):751-9. PMC: 2376080. View

2.
Hagaman J, Kinder B, Eckman M . Thiopurine S- methyltransferase [corrected] testing in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a pharmacogenetic cost-effectiveness analysis. Lung. 2010; 188(2):125-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00408-009-9217-8. View

3.
Hall P, McCabe C, Stein R, Cameron D . Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 104(1):56-66. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr484. View

4.
Blank P, Schwenkglenks M, Moch H, Szucs T . Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in early breast cancer patients: a Swiss cost-effectiveness analysis of different predictive assay strategies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 124(2):497-507. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0862-7. View

5.
Owens D . Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13(10):716-7. PMC: 1497852. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00211.x. View