» Articles » PMID: 18599170

Do Poorer People Have Poorer Access to Local Resources and Facilities? The Distribution of Local Resources by Area Deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2008 Jul 5
PMID 18599170
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has commonly been suggested that in modern cities individual or household deprivation (for example, low income or education) is amplified by area level deprivation (for example, lack of jobs or good schools), in ways which damage the health of the poorest and increase health inequalities. The aim of this study was to determine the location of a range of resources and exposures by deprivation in a UK city. We examined the location of 42 resources in Glasgow City, Scotland, in 2005-2006, by quintile of small area deprivation. Measures included number per 1000 population, network distance to nearest resource, and percentage of data zones containing at least one of each type of resource. Twelve resources had higher density in, and/or were closer to or more common in, more deprived neighbourhoods: public nurseries, public primary schools, police stations, pharmacies, credit unions, post offices, bus stops, bingo halls, public swimming pools, public sports centres, outdoor play areas, and vacant and derelict land/buildings. Sixteen had higher density in, and/or were closer to, or more common in, more affluent neighbourhoods: public secondary schools, private schools, banks, building societies, museums/art galleries, railway stations, subway stations, tennis courts, bowling greens, private health clubs, private swimming pools, colleges, A & E hospitals, parks, waste disposal sites, and tourist attractions. Private nurseries, Universities, fire stations, general, dental and ophthalmic practices, pawn brokers, ATMs, supermarkets, fast food chains, cafes, public libraries, golf courses, and cinemas showed no clear pattern by deprivation. Thus it appears that in the early 21st century access to resources does not always disadvantage poorer neighbourhoods in the UK. We conclude that we need to ensure that theories and policies are based on up-to-date and context-specific empirical evidence on the distribution of neighbourhood resources, and to engage in further research on interactions between individual and environmental factors in shaping health and health inequalities.

Citing Articles

Inequalities in geographical distribution of heritage in Scotland, investigating spatial exposure to heritage sites through area-based and individual-based (GPS) measurement.

MacDonald L, Caryl F, Mitchell R Wellbeing Space Soc. 2024; 7:100211.

PMID: 39698237 PMC: 11649978. DOI: 10.1016/j.wss.2024.100211.


'Why do GPs want to come here?': residents' intentions to register with new-coming GPs in a disadvantaged neighbourhood in Copenhagen with a GP shortage: a qualitative study.

Dandanell Garn S, Villadsen S, Glumer C, Johansen K, Christensen U Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024; 42(4):538-549.

PMID: 39516178 PMC: 11552271. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2354361.


Indicators of community physical activity resources and opportunities and variation by community sociodemographic characteristics: A scoping review.

Rogers A, Schenkelberg M, Stoepker P, Westmark D, Srivastava D, Dzewaltowski D Prev Med Rep. 2024; 40:102656.

PMID: 38435416 PMC: 10904198. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102656.


Unearthing Inequities in the Relationship between Multiple Sociodemographic Factors and Diverse Elements of Park Availability and Quality in a Major Southern Metropolitan Region.

Hallum S, Wende M, Hesam Shariati F, Thomas K, Chupak A, Witherspoon E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(2).

PMID: 38397693 PMC: 10888646. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21020204.


Evaluating cognitive behavioral therapy as a solution for postnatal depression in economically disadvantaged regions.

Sarfraz Z, Sarfraz A, Amin S Arch Womens Ment Health. 2024; 27(3):459-475.

PMID: 38294495 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-024-01428-2.


References
1.
Karvonen S, Rimpela A . Socio-regional context as a determinant of adolescents' health behaviour in Finland. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 43(10):1467-74. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00044-5. View

2.
Diez-Roux A, Nieto F, Muntaner C, Tyroler H, Comstock G, Shahar E . Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997; 146(1):48-63. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009191. View

3.
Waitzman N, Smith K . Phantom of the area: poverty-area residence and mortality in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88(6):973-6. PMC: 1508210. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.973. View

4.
Pearce J, Witten K, Hiscock R, Blakely T . Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources?. Int J Epidemiol. 2006; 36(2):348-55. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyl267. View

5.
Hart J . The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971; 1(7696):405-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x. View