» Articles » PMID: 9491010

Bringing Context Back into Epidemiology: Variables and Fallacies in Multilevel Analysis

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 1998 Mar 10
PMID 9491010
Citations 320
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A large portion of current epidemiologic research is based on methodologic individualism: the notion that the distribution of health and disease in populations can be explained exclusively in terms of the characteristics of individuals. The present paper discusses the need to include group- or macro-level variables in epidemiologic studies, thus incorporating multiple levels of determination in the study of health outcomes. These types of analyses, which have been called contextual or multi-level analyses, challenge epidemiologists to develop theoretical models of disease causation that extend across levels and explain how group-level and individual-level variables interact in shaping health and disease. They also raise a series of methodological issues, including the need to select the appropriate contextual unit and contextual variables, to correctly specify the individual-level model, and, in some cases, to account for residual correlation between individuals within contexts. Despite its complexities, multilevel analysis holds potential for reemphasizing the role of macro-level variables in shaping health and disease in populations.

Citing Articles

Why downsizing may increase sickness absence: longitudinal fixed effects analyses of the importance of the work environment.

Gronstad A, Bernstrom V BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):325.

PMID: 40022091 PMC: 11869673. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12454-w.


Examining individual- versus population-level social determinants of health in a cluster randomized trial of health coaches for patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Charlson M, Wells M, Hollenberg J, Ramos R, Martinez G, Gerard M J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e191.

PMID: 39655003 PMC: 11626581. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.598.


Quantifying the magnitude of the general contextual effect in a multilevel study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ontario, Canada: application of the median rate ratio in population health research.

Watson T, Kwong J, Kornas K, Mishra S, Rosella L Popul Health Metr. 2024; 22(1):27.

PMID: 39375666 PMC: 11457329. DOI: 10.1186/s12963-024-00348-8.


Implications of child poverty reduction targets for public health and health inequalities in England: a modelling study between 2024 and 2033.

McCabe R, Pollack R, Broadbent P, Thomson R, Igelstrom E, Pearce A J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 78(10):632-640.

PMID: 39107099 PMC: 11420728. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222313.


The prevalence of mental health and addiction concerns and factors associated with depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study.

Chang O, Levitt A, Khalid M, Kodeeswaran S, Markoulakis R PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305229.

PMID: 38865358 PMC: 11168667. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305229.


References
1.
. Public Health Weekly Reports for NOVEMBER 12, 1920. Public Health Rep (1896). 2009; 35(46):2673-2761. PMC: 1996833. View

2.
Jones K, Moon G, Clegg A . Ecological and individual effects in childhood immunisation uptake: a multi-level approach. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 33(4):501-8. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90332-7. View

3.
Wing S, Barnett E, Casper M, Tyroler H . Geographic and socioeconomic variation in the onset of decline of coronary heart disease mortality in white women. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82(2):204-9. PMC: 1694306. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.2.204. View

4.
Cassel J . SOCIAL SCIENCE THEORY AS A SOURCE OF HYPOTHESES IN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964; 54:1482-8. PMC: 1255001. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.54.9.1482. View

5.
Greenland S, Morgenstern H . Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. Int J Epidemiol. 1989; 18(1):269-74. DOI: 10.1093/ije/18.1.269. View