» Articles » PMID: 18556589

What Animal Models Teach Humans About Tuberculosis

Overview
Date 2008 Jun 17
PMID 18556589
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal models have become standard tools for the study of a wide array of human infectious diseases. Although there are no true animal reservoirs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, many different animal species are susceptible to infection with this organism and have served as valuable tools for the study of tuberculosis (TB). The most commonly used experimental animal models of TB are the mouse, rabbit, and guinea pig. Although substantial differences in TB susceptibility and disease manifestations exist between these species, they have contributed significantly to the understanding of TB immunopathogenesis, host genetic influence on infection, efficacy of antimicrobial therapy, and host/pathogen interactions that determine the outcome or severity of infection. Among the three species, mice are relatively resistant to TB infection, followed by rabbits and then guinea pigs, which are extremely vulnerable to infection. Mice are most often used in experiments on immune responses to TB infection and drug regimens against TB. Rabbits, unlike the other two animal models, develop cavitary TB and offer a means to study the factors leading to this form of the disease. Guinea pigs, due to their high susceptibility to infection, have been ideal for studies on airborne transmission and vaccine efficacy. In addition to these three species, TB research has occasionally involved nonhuman primates and cattle models. Current concepts in TB pathogenesis have also been derived from animal studies involving experimentally induced infections with related mycobacteria (e.g., Mycobacterium bovis) whose manifestations in select animal hosts mimic human TB.

Citing Articles

Systematic review of innate immune responses against complex infection in animal models.

Nieto Ramirez L, Mehaffy C, Dobos K Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1467016.

PMID: 39949719 PMC: 11821578. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1467016.


A brief overview of mathematical modeling of the within-host dynamics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Chakraborty D, Batabyal S, Ganusov V Front Appl Math Stat. 2025; 10.

PMID: 39906541 PMC: 11793202. DOI: 10.3389/fams.2024.1355373.


Comparative study of a rabbit model of spinal tuberculosis using different concentrations of .

Qiao Y, Song X, Zhang L, Li F, Zhang H, Zhou S World J Orthop. 2025; 16(1):101424.

PMID: 39850038 PMC: 11752485. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i1.101424.


Methods and Models for Studying in Respiratory Infections.

Franco C, Rezzani R Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39795880 PMC: 11719571. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010018.


Immune cell infiltration and modulation of the blood-brain barrier in a guinea pig model of tuberculosis: Observations without evidence of bacterial dissemination to the brain.

Latham A, Geer C, Ackart D, Weninger K, Gross C, Podell B PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0307577.

PMID: 39739680 PMC: 11687776. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307577.


References
1.
RILEY R . Aerial dissemination of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1957; 76(6):931-41. DOI: 10.1164/artpd.1957.76.6.931. View

2.
Rosenthal I, Zhang M, Williams K, Peloquin C, Tyagi S, Vernon A . Daily dosing of rifapentine cures tuberculosis in three months or less in the murine model. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(12):e344. PMC: 2140085. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040344. View

3.
Orme I . The mouse as a useful model of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2003; 83(1-3):112-5. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-9792(02)00069-0. View

4.
Ito T, Schaller M, Hogaboam C, Standiford T, Chensue S, Kunkel S . TLR9 activation is a key event for the maintenance of a mycobacterial antigen-elicited pulmonary granulomatous response. Eur J Immunol. 2007; 37(10):2847-55. DOI: 10.1002/eji.200737603. View

5.
RILEY R, Mills C, Ogrady F, SULTAN L, WITTSTADT F, SHIVPURI D . Infectiousness of air from a tuberculosis ward. Ultraviolet irradiation of infected air: comparative infectiousness of different patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1962; 85:511-25. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1962.85.4.511. View