» Articles » PMID: 18441418

Transcranial Current Stimulation Focality Using Disc and Ring Electrode Configurations: FEM Analysis

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2008 Apr 29
PMID 18441418
Citations 115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We calculated the electric fields induced in the brain during transcranial current stimulation (TCS) using a finite-element concentric spheres human head model. A range of disc electrode configurations were simulated: (1) distant-bipolar; (2) adjacent-bipolar; (3) tripolar; and three ring designs, (4) belt, (5) concentric ring, and (6) double concentric ring. We compared the focality of each configuration targeting cortical structures oriented normal to the surface ('surface-radial' and 'cross-section radial'), cortical structures oriented along the brain surface ('surface-tangential' and 'cross-section tangential') and non-oriented cortical surface structures ('surface-magnitude' and 'cross-section magnitude'). For surface-radial fields, we further considered the 'polarity' of modulation (e.g. superficial cortical neuron soma hyper/depolarizing). The distant-bipolar configuration, which is comparable with commonly used TCS protocols, resulted in diffuse (un-focal) modulation with bi-directional radial modulation under each electrode and tangential modulation between electrodes. Increasing the proximity of the two electrodes (adjacent-bipolar electrode configuration) increased focality, at the cost of more surface current. At similar electrode distances, the tripolar-electrodes configuration produced comparable peak focality, but reduced radial bi-directionality. The concentric-ring configuration resulted in the highest spatial focality and uni-directional radial modulation, at the expense of increased total surface current. Changing ring dimensions, or use of two concentric rings, allow titration of this balance. The concentric-ring design may thus provide an optimized configuration for targeted modulation of superficial cortical neurons.

Citing Articles

The Modulatory Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Brain Oscillatory Patterns in the Beta Band in Healthy Older Adults.

Morales Fajardo K, Yan X, Lungoci G, Casado Sanchez M, Mitsis G, Boudrias M Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766483 PMC: 11675015. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121284.


Advanced Methodology for Neurophysiological Analysis and Biomarker Development: Time-Frequency and Source-Localization Approaches.

Sehatpour P, Javitt D Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 40:119-141.

PMID: 39562443 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_5.


Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity.

Pileckyte I, Soto-Faraco S Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):109.

PMID: 39558084 PMC: 11574275. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00158-6.


Beta tACS of varying intensities differentially affect resting-state and movement-related M1-M1 connectivity.

Wansbrough K, Marinovic W, Fujiyama H, Vallence A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1425527.

PMID: 39371612 PMC: 11450697. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1425527.


Unpacking Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation using simulations and relating current flow to reported motions: Comparison across common and specialized electrode placements.

Truong D, Thomas C, Ira S, Valter Y, Clark T, Datta A PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309007.

PMID: 39186497 PMC: 11346646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309007.