Transcranial Current Stimulation Focality Using Disc and Ring Electrode Configurations: FEM Analysis
Overview
Neurology
Affiliations
We calculated the electric fields induced in the brain during transcranial current stimulation (TCS) using a finite-element concentric spheres human head model. A range of disc electrode configurations were simulated: (1) distant-bipolar; (2) adjacent-bipolar; (3) tripolar; and three ring designs, (4) belt, (5) concentric ring, and (6) double concentric ring. We compared the focality of each configuration targeting cortical structures oriented normal to the surface ('surface-radial' and 'cross-section radial'), cortical structures oriented along the brain surface ('surface-tangential' and 'cross-section tangential') and non-oriented cortical surface structures ('surface-magnitude' and 'cross-section magnitude'). For surface-radial fields, we further considered the 'polarity' of modulation (e.g. superficial cortical neuron soma hyper/depolarizing). The distant-bipolar configuration, which is comparable with commonly used TCS protocols, resulted in diffuse (un-focal) modulation with bi-directional radial modulation under each electrode and tangential modulation between electrodes. Increasing the proximity of the two electrodes (adjacent-bipolar electrode configuration) increased focality, at the cost of more surface current. At similar electrode distances, the tripolar-electrodes configuration produced comparable peak focality, but reduced radial bi-directionality. The concentric-ring configuration resulted in the highest spatial focality and uni-directional radial modulation, at the expense of increased total surface current. Changing ring dimensions, or use of two concentric rings, allow titration of this balance. The concentric-ring design may thus provide an optimized configuration for targeted modulation of superficial cortical neurons.
Morales Fajardo K, Yan X, Lungoci G, Casado Sanchez M, Mitsis G, Boudrias M Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.
PMID: 39766483 PMC: 11675015. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121284.
Sehatpour P, Javitt D Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 40:119-141.
PMID: 39562443 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_5.
Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity.
Pileckyte I, Soto-Faraco S Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):109.
PMID: 39558084 PMC: 11574275. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00158-6.
Wansbrough K, Marinovic W, Fujiyama H, Vallence A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1425527.
PMID: 39371612 PMC: 11450697. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1425527.
Truong D, Thomas C, Ira S, Valter Y, Clark T, Datta A PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309007.
PMID: 39186497 PMC: 11346646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309007.