» Articles » PMID: 18421372

Investigations of Oligonucleotide Usage Variance Within and Between Prokaryotes

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Apr 19
PMID 18421372
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oligonucleotide usage in archaeal and bacterial genomes can be linked to a number of properties, including codon usage (trinucleotides), DNA base-stacking energy (dinucleotides), and DNA structural conformation (di- to tetranucleotides). We wanted to assess the statistical information potential of different DNA 'word-sizes' and explore how oligonucleotide frequencies differ in coding and non-coding regions. In addition, we used oligonucleotide frequencies to investigate DNA composition and how DNA sequence patterns change within and between prokaryotic organisms. Among the results found was that prokaryotic chromosomes can be described by hexanucleotide frequencies, suggesting that prokaryotic DNA is predominantly short range correlated, i.e., information in prokaryotic genomes is encoded in short oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotide usage varied more within AT-rich and host-associated genomes than in GC-rich and free-living genomes, and this variation was mainly located in non-coding regions. Bias (selectional pressure) in tetranucleotide usage correlated with GC content, and coding regions were more biased than non-coding regions. Non-coding regions were also found to be approximately 5.5% more AT-rich than coding regions, on average, in the 402 chromosomes examined. Pronounced DNA compositional differences were found both within and between AT-rich and GC-rich genomes. GC-rich genomes were more similar and biased in terms of tetranucleotide usage in non-coding regions than AT-rich genomes. The differences found between AT-rich and GC-rich genomes may possibly be attributed to lifestyle, since tetranucleotide usage within host-associated bacteria was, on average, more dissimilar and less biased than free-living archaea and bacteria.

Citing Articles

Compression rates of microbial genomes are associated with genome size and base composition.

Bohlin J, Pettersson J Genomics Inform. 2024; 22(1):16.

PMID: 39390533 PMC: 11468749. DOI: 10.1186/s44342-024-00018-z.


Solving genomic puzzles: computational methods for metagenomic binning.

Mallawaarachchi V, Wickramarachchi A, Xue H, Papudeshi B, Grigson S, Bouras G Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(5).

PMID: 39082646 PMC: 11289683. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae372.


Roles of adenine methylation and genetic mutations in adaptation to different temperatures in .

Bruneaux M, Kronholm I, Ashrafi R, Ketola T Epigenetics. 2021; 17(8):861-881.

PMID: 34519613 PMC: 9423861. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2021.1966215.


Xenogeneic Silencing and Bacterial Genome Evolution: Mechanisms for DNA Recognition Imply Multifaceted Roles of Xenogeneic Silencers.

Duan B, Ding P, Navarre W, Liu J, Xia B Mol Biol Evol. 2021; 38(10):4135-4148.

PMID: 34003286 PMC: 8476142. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab136.


Exploring short k-mer profiles in cells and mobile elements from Archaea highlights the major influence of both the ecological niche and evolutionary history.

Bize A, Midoux C, Mariadassou M, Schbath S, Forterre P, Da Cunha V BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):186.

PMID: 33726663 PMC: 7962313. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07471-y.


References
1.
Konstantinidis K, Tiedje J . Trends between gene content and genome size in prokaryotic species with larger genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(9):3160-5. PMC: 365760. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0308653100. View

2.
Willenbrock H, Friis C, Juncker A, Ussery D . An environmental signature for 323 microbial genomes based on codon adaptation indices. Genome Biol. 2006; 7(12):R114. PMC: 1794427. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r114. View

3.
Musto H, Naya H, Zavala A, Romero H, Alvarez-Valin F, Bernardi G . Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 347(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.054. View

4.
Musto H, Naya H, Zavala A, Romero H, Alvarez-Valin F, Bernardi G . The correlation between genomic G+C and optimal growth temperature of prokaryotes is robust: a reply to Marashi and Ghalanbor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 330(2):357-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.133. View

5.
Packer M, Dauncey M, Hunter C . Sequence-dependent DNA structure: tetranucleotide conformational maps. J Mol Biol. 2000; 295(1):85-103. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3237. View