» Articles » PMID: 18421122

Can Megavoltage Computed Tomography Reduce Proton Range Uncertainties in Treatment Plans for Patients with Large Metal Implants?

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2008 Apr 19
PMID 18421122
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treatment planning calculations for proton therapy require an accurate knowledge of radiological path length, or range, to the distal edge of the target volume. In most cases, the range may be calculated with sufficient accuracy using kilovoltage (kV) computed tomography (CT) images. However, metal implants such as hip prostheses can cause severe streak artifacts that lead to large uncertainties in proton range. The purposes of this study were to quantify streak-related range errors and to determine if they could be avoided by using artifact-free megavoltage (MV) CT images in treatment planning. Proton treatment plans were prepared for a rigid, heterogeneous phantom and for a prostate cancer patient with a metal hip prosthesis using corrected and uncorrected kVCT images alone, uncorrected MVCT images and a combination of registered MVCT and kVCT images (the hybrid approach). Streak-induced range errors of 5-12 mm were present in the uncorrected kVCT-based patient plan. Correcting the streaks by manually assigning estimated true Hounsfield units improved the range accuracy. In a rigid heterogeneous phantom, the implant-related range uncertainty was estimated at <3 mm for both the corrected kVCT-based plan and the uncorrected MVCT-based plan. The hybrid planning approach yielded the best overall result. In this approach, the kVCT images provided good delineation of soft tissues due to high-contrast resolution, and the streak-free MVCT images provided smaller range uncertainties because they did not require artifact correction.

Citing Articles

Use of Carbon Fiber Implants to Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy for Spine Tumor Patients.

Lam F, Guru S, AbuReesh D, Hori Y, Chuang C, Liu L Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002531 PMC: 11852773. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020199.


Evaluation of the Treatment Planning and Delivery for Hip Implant Cases on Tomotherapy.

Singh P, Verma R, Tripathi D, Singh S, Bhushan M, Kumar L J Med Phys. 2024; 49(2):270-278.

PMID: 39131420 PMC: 11309148. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_182_23.


PTCOG Gastrointestinal Subcommittee Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Malignancies Consensus Statement.

Choi J, Wojcieszynski A, Amos R, Giap H, Apisarnthanarax S, Ashman J Int J Part Ther. 2024; 11:100019.

PMID: 38757077 PMC: 11095104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100019.


Improved accuracy of relative electron density and proton stopping power ratio through CycleGAN machine learning.

Scholey J, Vinas L, Kearney V, Yom S, Larson P, Descovich M Phys Med Biol. 2022; 67(10).

PMID: 35417903 PMC: 9121765. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac6725.


Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.

Poon D, Wu S, Ho L, Cheung K, Yu B Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(4).

PMID: 35205673 PMC: 8870339. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040925.


References
1.
Langen K, Meeks S, Poole D, Wagner T, Willoughby T, Kupelian P . The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(18):4259-76. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/18/002. View

2.
Simpson R, Chen C, Grubbs E, Swindell W . A 4-MV CT scanner for radiation therapy: the prototype system. Med Phys. 1982; 9(4):574-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.595102. View

3.
Vanderstraeten B, Chin P, Fix M, Leal A, Mora G, Reynaert N . Conversion of CT numbers into tissue parameters for Monte Carlo dose calculations: a multi-centre study. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(3):539-62. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/001. View

4.
Jeraj R, Mackie T, Balog J, Olivera G, Pearson D, Kapatoes J . Radiation characteristics of helical tomotherapy. Med Phys. 2004; 31(2):396-404. DOI: 10.1118/1.1639148. View

5.
Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A . The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 1996; 41(1):111-24. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/1/009. View