» Articles » PMID: 18403592

Molecular and Cytogenetic Characterization of Plexiform Leiomyomata Provide Further Evidence for Genetic Heterogeneity Underlying Uterine Fibroids

Overview
Journal Am J Pathol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pathology
Date 2008 Apr 12
PMID 18403592
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The plexiform variant of uterine leiomyomata (UL) is named for its ribbons or nests of smooth muscle cells that have a rounded, epithelioid shape caused by their entrapment in abundant extracellular matrix. Plexiform UL are currently classified as epithelioid smooth muscle tumors alongside the less predictable, "true" epithelioid tumors (ie, leiomyoblastomas). Karyotypes of six plexiform UL cases were studied, and their abnormalities were found to differ from those of leiomyoblastomas. Analyses using real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated elevated mRNA and protein levels of the architectural factor HMGA2 and, in some cases, increased DNA copy number. Four of these plexiform UL were profiled with Affymetrix human U133 plus 2.0 expression arrays. Cluster analysis using genes previously shown to discriminate benign and malignant uterine smooth muscle tissues revealed that the plexiform tumors form an isolated group in the benign branch. This is in contrast to an earlier finding in which another variant, cellular UL characterized by loss of a portion of the short arm of chromosome 1, clustered with malignant leiomyosarcomas. These results provide additional evidence of genetic heterogeneity underlying UL of various histological types. We further suggest that plexiform UL should be classified among tumors with extensive hyalinization rather than with "true" epithelioid smooth muscle neoplasms.

Citing Articles

Uterine fibroids - Causes, impact, treatment, and lens to the African perspective.

Sefah N, Ndebele S, Prince L, Korasare E, Agbleke M, Nkansah A Front Pharmacol. 2023; 13:1045783.

PMID: 36703761 PMC: 9871264. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1045783.


Comprehensive Review of Uterine Fibroids: Developmental Origin, Pathogenesis, and Treatment.

Yang Q, Ciebiera M, Bariani M, Ali M, Elkafas H, Boyer T Endocr Rev. 2021; 43(4):678-719.

PMID: 34741454 PMC: 9277653. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnab039.


Clinico-pathological features of gynecological myopericytoma: a challenging diagnosis in an exceptional location.

Borella F, Lucchino F, Bertero L, Ribotta M, Castellano I, Carosso A Virchows Arch. 2019; 475(6):763-770.

PMID: 31410559 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02645-2.


Evidence of biomechanical and collagen heterogeneity in uterine fibroids.

Jayes F, Liu B, Feng L, Aviles-Espinoza N, Leikin S, Leppert P PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0215646.

PMID: 31034494 PMC: 6488189. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215646.


Factors associated with uterine fibroid in Ghanaian women undergoing pelvic scans with suspected uterine fibroid.

Sarkodie B, Botwe B, Adjei D, Ofori E Fertil Res Pract. 2017; 2:9.

PMID: 28620536 PMC: 5424414. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-016-0022-9.


References
1.
Evans H, Chawla S, Simpson C, Finn K . Smooth muscle neoplasms of the uterus other than ordinary leiomyoma. A study of 46 cases, with emphasis on diagnostic criteria and prognostic factors. Cancer. 1988; 62(10):2239-47. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881115)62:10<2239::aid-cncr2820621028>3.0.co;2-y. View

2.
Bismar T, Demichelis F, Riva A, Kim R, Varambally S, He L . Defining aggressive prostate cancer using a 12-gene model. Neoplasia. 2006; 8(1):59-68. PMC: 1584291. DOI: 10.1593/neo.05664. View

3.
Lepine L, Hillis S, Marchbanks P, Koonin L, Morrow B, Kieke B . Hysterectomy surveillance--United States, 1980-1993. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1997; 46(4):1-15. View

4.
Fisher E, Paulson J, Gregorio R . The myofibroblastic nature of the uterine plexiform tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978; 102(9):477-80. View

5.
Cheung V, Nowak N, Jang W, Kirsch I, Zhao S, Chen X . Integration of cytogenetic landmarks into the draft sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2001; 409(6822):953-8. PMC: 7845515. DOI: 10.1038/35057192. View