» Articles » PMID: 18338384

Refining Homology Models by Combining Replica-exchange Molecular Dynamics and Statistical Potentials

Overview
Journal Proteins
Date 2008 Mar 14
PMID 18338384
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A protocol is presented for the global refinement of homology models of proteins. It combines the advantages of temperature-based replica-exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) for conformational sampling and the use of statistical potentials for model selection. The protocol was tested using 21 models. Of these 14 were models of 10 small proteins for which high-resolution crystal structures were available, the remainder were targets of the recent CASPR exercise. It was found that REMD in combination with currently available force fields could sample near-native conformational states starting from high-quality homology models. Conformations in which the backbone RMSD of secondary structure elements (SSE-RMSD) was lower than the starting value by 0.5-1.0 A were found for 15 out of the 21 cases (average 0.82 A). Furthermore, when a simple scoring function consisting of two statistical potentials was used to rank the structures, one or more structures with SSE-RMSD of at least 0.2 A lower than the starting value was found among the five best ranked structures in 11 out of the 21 cases. The average improvement in SSE-RMSD for the best models was 0.42 A. However, none of the scoring functions tested identified the structures with the lowest SSE-RMSD as the best models although all identified the native conformation as the one with lowest energy. This suggests that while the proposed protocol proved effective for the refinement of high-quality models of small proteins scoring functions remain one of the major limiting factors in structure refinement. This and other aspects by which the methodology could be further improved are discussed.

Citing Articles

Modelling protein-protein interactions for the design of vaccine chimeric antigens with protective epitopes.

Contreras M, Rafael M, Sobrino I, Almazan C, Pastor Comin J, Valdes J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318439.

PMID: 39928697 PMC: 11809815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318439.


Improving the thermostability of Pseudoalteromonas Porphyrae κ-carrageenase by rational design and MD simulation.

Sang Y, Huang X, Li H, Hong T, Zheng M, Li Z AMB Express. 2024; 14(1):8.

PMID: 38245573 PMC: 10799840. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-024-01661-z.


Single-Component Multilayered Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticles Displaying Extracellular Domains of Matrix Protein 2 as a Pan-influenza A Vaccine.

Gomes K, Zhang Y, Lee Y, Eldad M, Lim A, Ward G ACS Nano. 2023; 17(23):23545-23567.

PMID: 37988765 PMC: 10722606. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c06526.


Applications of Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Structure Prediction of Peptides and Proteins.

Geng H, Chen F, Ye J, Jiang F Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019; 17:1162-1170.

PMID: 31462972 PMC: 6709365. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.07.010.


Methods for the Refinement of Protein Structure 3D Models.

Adiyaman R, McGuffin L Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(9).

PMID: 31075942 PMC: 6539982. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20092301.


References
1.
Garcia A, Sanbonmatsu K . Exploring the energy landscape of a beta hairpin in explicit solvent. Proteins. 2001; 42(3):345-54. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0134(20010215)42:3<345::aid-prot50>3.0.co;2-h. View

2.
Edgar R, Sjolander K . COACH: profile-profile alignment of protein families using hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(8):1309-18. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth091. View

3.
Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Honig B . Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines. Protein Sci. 2007; 16(8):1557-68. PMC: 2203356. DOI: 10.1110/ps.072856307. View

4.
Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie J . VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol. 1997; 277:396-404. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)77022-8. View

5.
Li X, Jacobson M, Friesner R . High-resolution prediction of protein helix positions and orientations. Proteins. 2004; 55(2):368-82. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20014. View