Single Mitochondrial Gene Barcodes Reliably Identify Sister-species in Diverse Clades of Birds

Overview

Journal BMC Evol Biol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biology

Date 2008 Mar 11

PMID 18328107

Citations 57

Authors

Erika S Tavares

Allan J Baker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: DNA barcoding of life using a standardized COI sequence was proposed as a species identification system, and as a method for detecting putative new species. Previous tests in birds showed that individuals can be correctly assigned to species in ~94% of the cases and suggested a threshold of 10x mean intraspecific difference to detect potential new species. However, these tests were criticized because they were based on a single maternally inherited gene rather than multiple nuclear genes, did not compare phylogenetically identified sister species, and thus likely overestimated the efficacy of DNA barcodes in identifying species.

Results: To test the efficacy of DNA barcodes we compared ~650 bp of COI in 60 sister-species pairs identified in multigene phylogenies from 10 orders of birds. In all pairs, individuals of each species were monophyletic in a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree, and each species possessed fixed mutational differences distinguishing them from their sister species. Consequently, individuals were correctly assigned to species using a statistical coalescent framework. A coalescent test of taxonomic distinctiveness based on chance occurrence of reciprocal monophyly in two lineages was verified in known sister species, and used to identify recently separated lineages that represent putative species. This approach avoids the use of a universal distance cutoff which is invalidated by variation in times to common ancestry of sister species and in rates of evolution.

Conclusion: Closely related sister species of birds can be identified reliably by barcodes of fixed diagnostic substitutions in COI sequences, verifying coalescent-based statistical tests of reciprocal monophyly for taxonomic distinctiveness. Contrary to recent criticisms, a single DNA barcode is a rapid way to discover monophyletic lineages within a metapopulation that might represent undiscovered cryptic species, as envisaged in the unified species concept. This identifies a smaller set of lineages that can also be tested independently for species status with multiple nuclear gene approaches and other phenotypic characters.

Citing Articles

Population Genetics of Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Türkiye.

Bursali F, Simsek F Acta Parasitol. 2024; 69(2):1157-1171.

PMID: 38592372 PMC: 11182820. DOI: 10.1007/s11686-024-00844-9.

H10Nx avian influenza viruses detected in wild birds in China pose potential threat to mammals.

Lv X, Tian J, Li X, Bai X, Li Y, Li M One Health. 2023; 16:100515.

PMID: 37363234 PMC: 10288057. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100515.

The potential and shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA analysis for cheetah conservation management.

Meissner R, Winter S, Westerhus U, Sliwa A, Greve C, Bottriell L Conserv Genet. 2023; 24(1):125-136.

PMID: 36694805 PMC: 9859914. DOI: 10.1007/s10592-022-01483-1.

DNA barcodes reveal population-dependent cryptic diversity and various cases of sympatry of Korean leptonetid spiders (Araneae: Leptonetidae).

Oh J, Kim S, Lee S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):15528.

PMID: 36109541 PMC: 9478141. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18666-y.

Genetic and morphological identification of filarial worm from Iberian hare in Portugal.

Dos Santos F, Duarte M, Carvalho C, Monteiro M, Carvalho P, Mendonca P Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9310.

PMID: 35661130 PMC: 9166702. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13354-3.

References

Hudson R, Coyne J . Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution. 2002; 56(8):1557-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01467.x. View

Shawkey M, Balenger S, Hill G, Johnson L, Keyser A, Siefferman L . Mechanisms of evolutionary change in structural plumage coloration among bluebirds (Sialia spp.). J R Soc Interface. 2006; 3(9):527-32. PMC: 1664640. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0111. View

Nielsen R, Wakeley J . Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics. 2001; 158(2):885-96. PMC: 1461674. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.885. View

Ward R, Zemlak T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert P . DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005; 360(1462):1847-57. PMC: 1609232. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716. View

Yamada K, Nishida-Umehara C, Matsuda Y . Characterization and chromosomal distribution of novel satellite DNA sequences of the lesser rhea (Pterocnemia pennata) and the greater rhea (Rhea americana). Chromosome Res. 2002; 10(6):513-23. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020996431588. View

Baker A, Pereira S, Haddrath O, Edge K . Multiple gene evidence for expansion of extant penguins out of Antarctica due to global cooling. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1582):11-7. PMC: 1560011. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3260. View

Moritz C, Cicero C . DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(10):e354. PMC: 519004. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354. View

Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng P . DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol. 2006; 55(5):715-28. DOI: 10.1080/10635150600969864. View

Lacey Knowles L, Carstens B . Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst Biol. 2007; 56(6):887-95. DOI: 10.1080/10635150701701091. View

10.

Rubinoff D . Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv Biol. 2006; 20(4):1026-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00372.x. View

11.

Kerr K, Stoeckle M, Dove C, Weigt L, Francis C, Hebert P . Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes. 2008; 7(4):535-543. PMC: 2259444. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01670.x. View

12.

Hey J, Nielsen R . Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics. 2004; 167(2):747-60. PMC: 1470901. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.103.024182. View

13.

Drovetski S . Molecular phylogeny of grouse: individual and combined performance of W-linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. Syst Biol. 2003; 51(6):930-45. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102500. View

14.

Omland K, Lanyon S, Fritz S . A molecular phylogeny of the New World orioles (Icterus): the importance of dense taxon sampling. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999; 12(2):224-39. DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0611. View

15.

Cohen B, Baker A, Blechschmidt K, Dittmann D, Furness R, Gerwin J . Enigmatic phylogeny of skuas (Aves:Stercorariidae). Proc Biol Sci. 1997; 264(1379):181-90. PMC: 1688246. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0026. View

16.

DeSalle R, Egan M, Siddall M . The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005; 360(1462):1905-16. PMC: 1609226. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1722. View

17.

Kuhner M, Yamato J, Felsenstein J . Maximum likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent. Genetics. 1998; 149(1):429-34. PMC: 1460154. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.429. View

18.

Pereira S, Baker A, Wajntal A . Combined nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences resolve generic relationships within the Cracidae (Galliformes, Aves). Syst Biol. 2003; 51(6):946-58. DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102519. View

19.

Meyer C, Paulay G . DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(12):e422. PMC: 1287506. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422. View

20.

Saether B, Lande R, Engen S, Weimerskirch H, Lillegard M, Altwegg R . Generation time and temporal scaling of bird population dynamics. Nature. 2005; 436(7047):99-102. DOI: 10.1038/nature03666. View