» Articles » PMID: 18303301

Microcystic Meningioma: Importance of Obvious Hypointensity on T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Images

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Feb 28
PMID 18303301
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of various magnetic resonance imaging findings for microcystic meningioma.

Methods: Magnetic resonance images of 26 patients with microcystic meningioma (8 from our series and 18 from the literature) and 32 control subjects with other types of meningiomas were evaluated for obvious hypointensity relative to the cerebral cortex on T1-weighted images (T1WIs), obvious hyperintensity relative to the cerebral cortex on T2-weighted images (T2WIs), a radial or sunburst vascular pattern, marginal and reticular enhancement, severe peritumoral brain edema, and the dural tail sign. Differences in the frequencies of these findings between the microcystic and control groups were examined by means of the chi2 test. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of these findings in the diagnosis of microcystic meningioma were calculated. Multivariate analysis of the findings was also performed.

Results: The frequencies of obvious hypointensity on T1WI, obvious hyperintensity on T2WI, marginal and reticular enhancement, and severe peritumoral brain edema significantly differed between the microcystic and control groups (all P < 0.005). Sensitivities and specificities of hypointensity on T1WI and hyperintensity on T2WI in the diagnosis of microcystic meningioma were greater than 87%. After multivariate analysis, obvious hypointensity on T1WI was the only significant predictor of microcystic meningioma, with an odds ratio of 75.0 (95% confidence interval, 3.7-1536.0).

Conclusion: Obvious hypointensity relative to the cerebral cortex on T1WI was the most valuable magnetic resonance finding in the diagnosis of microcystic meningioma.

Citing Articles

Posterior fossa microcystic meningioma mimicking an arachnoid cyst.

Bridges J, Brougham J, Terrell D, Whipple S, Lee S Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(4):1284-1287.

PMID: 38292808 PMC: 10825519. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.12.065.


Benefits of Combined MRI Sequences in Meningioma Consistency Prediction: A Prospective Study of 287 Consecutive Patients.

Limpastan K, Unsrisong K, Vaniyapong T, Norasetthada T, Watcharasaksilp W, Jetjumnong C Asian J Neurosurg. 2022; 17(4):614-620.

PMID: 36570751 PMC: 9771632. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758849.


Imaging spectrum of meningiomas: a review of uncommon imaging appearances and their histopathological and prognostic significance.

Krishnan V, Mittal M, Sinha M, Thukral B Pol J Radiol. 2020; 84:e630-e653.

PMID: 32082462 PMC: 7016363. DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2019.92421.


Differentiating microcystic meningioma from atypical meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Xiaoai K, Qing Z, Lei H, Junlin Z Neuroradiology. 2020; 62(5):601-607.

PMID: 31996968 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02374-3.


Characteristic features and proposed classification in 69 cases of intracranial microcystic meningiomas.

Lin Z, Zhao M, Li X, Wang J, Qiu P, Lan F Neurosurg Rev. 2018; 42(2):443-453.

PMID: 29721630 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-0982-9.