» Articles » PMID: 18288529

Limb Performance and Patient Satisfaction After Radial Artery Harvesting: Endoscopic Versus Open Techniques

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Feb 22
PMID 18288529
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The differences in hand functionality after harvesting the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in an endoscopic technique relative to open technique are unclear.

Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients who had CABG and their non dominant hand radial artery was harvested either in an open technique (n = 92) or in an endoscopic technique (n = 72) in a period of 9.8 +/- 3.5 months after the operation were studied. Surgical technique was surgeon specific. Patients were asked either five questions (endoscopic group), or six questions (open group), to assess how radial artery harvesting affected them.

Results: Significantly more patients in the open group experienced significant limitations in their work and regular daily activities (12% versus 0%, p = 0.02), social activities (13% versus 0%, p = 0.005), and experienced significant pain (8% versus 0%, p = 0.04) compared with the endoscopic group. More patients in the open group complained that their arm incision disturb them (24% versus 10%, p = 0.01). Forty-two patients (46%) in the open group would prefer smaller incision. A "limitation score" variable was created from the first four questions to reflect overall functionality. Severe limitation was present in 3% of the open group versus 0% in the endoscopic group (p = 0.04). Female sex and open harvesting technique were found to be independently associated with higher limitation score.

Conclusions: After a mean of 9.8 months after surgery, patients reports good overall upper-limb function. However, more patients in the open technique had significant disabilities and dissatisfaction.

Citing Articles

Radial artery harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery-Endoscopic or open method? A meta-analysis.

Huang T, Huang T, Cheng Y, Wang Y, Chen T, Yin S PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0236499.

PMID: 32706808 PMC: 7380611. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236499.


Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial.

Carranza C, Ballegaard M, Werner M, Hasbak P, Kjaer A, Kofoed K Trials. 2014; 15:135.

PMID: 24754891 PMC: 4033613. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-135.

References
1.
Desai N, Cohen E, Naylor C, Fremes S . A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(22):2302-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040982. View

2.
Meharwal Z, Trehan N . Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72(5):1557-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03088-0. View

3.
Casselman F, La Meir M, Cammu G, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I . Initial experience with an endoscopic radial artery harvesting technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128(3):463-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.002. View

4.
Sajja L, Mannam G, Pantula N, Sompalli S . Role of radial artery graft in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79(6):2180-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.049. View

5.
Parolari A, Rubini P, Alamanni F, Cannata A, Xin W, Gherli T . The radial artery: which place in coronary operation?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69(4):1288-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01089-9. View