» Articles » PMID: 14726042

Patencies of 2127 Arterial to Coronary Conduits over 15 Years

Overview
Journal Ann Thorac Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2004 Jan 17
PMID 14726042
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Use of arterial grafts in coronary surgery is based on the excellent patency of the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) and an expectation that other arterial grafts-right internal thoracic artery (RITA) and radial artery (RA)-will give similar patencies, superior to saphenous vein. We examined patencies of arterial grafts in a practice with extensive use for more than 15 years.

Methods: Consecutive postoperative angiograms of 2,127 arterial/coronary conduits were evaluated. Angiograms were performed for cardiac symptoms. Assessment was by two observers. String signs were considered as occlusions.

Results: There were 2127 arterial conduits. Overall patencies were as follows: LITA, 96.4% (1296 of 1345); RITA, 88.3% (534 of 605); aortocoronary RA, 89.3% (158 of 177). The LITA patency to the left anterior descending artery was 97.1% (1131 of 1165); to the obtuse marginal artery it was 91.7% (165 of 180; p 0.01). The RITA pedicled graft patency was 86% (275 of 321) compared with free RITA, 91% (259 of 284; p = not significant). For RITA there was a hierarchy of patency for coronary territory grafted (left anterior descending artery best, right coronary/posterior descending artery worst) and for degree of coronary stenosis: if stenosis was less than 60%, patency was 65% (47 of 72); if stenosis was more than 60%, patency was 90.9% (485 of 533; p = 0.0001). Similarly for the radial artery there was higher patency with greater coronary stenosis. The LITA patency at 5 years was 98%, at 10 years it was 95%, and at 15 years it was 88%. The RITA patency at 5 years was 96%, at 10 years it was 81%, and at 15 years it was 65%. The radial artery patency at 1 year was 96% and at 4 years it was 89%. For 3,714 vein grafts also studied overall patency was 61% (2266 of 3214) with patencies of 95% at 5 years, 71% at 10 years, and 32% at 15 years.

Conclusions: Excellent long-term patencies of arterial grafts are noted, superior to those of vein grafts. Patencies were influenced by conduit, by distribution, and by coronary artery stenosis.

Citing Articles

Generalized hybrid coronary revascularization vs. conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Zhang S, Li P, Li G, Yan Y, Sun T, Lin J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1459072.

PMID: 40060966 PMC: 11885308. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1459072.


Non-Robotic Endoscopic-Assisted Internal Mammary Artery Harvest-A Historical Review and Recent Advancements.

Gortzen D, Sampon F, Ter Woorst J, Akca F J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39997502 PMC: 11856531. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12020068.


Is It Safe to Use Arterial Grafts in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction? Short-Mid-Term Propensity Analysis.

Lacava L, Borgomoni G, Lopes L, Freitas L, Freitas F, Dallan L Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024; e20230384(e20230384).

PMID: 39471264 PMC: 11497619. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0384.


Conduits and Strategies for Arterial Revascularization in CABG.

Alzghari T, Dimagli A, An K, Cancelli G, Harik L, Perezgorvas-Olaria R Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(7):188.

PMID: 39077016 PMC: 11266465. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2407188.


Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Artery Versus Bypass Graft in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Farag M, Brilakis E, Gasparini G, Spratt J, Egred M Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(7):232.

PMID: 39076928 PMC: 11266800. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2307232.