» Articles » PMID: 18282080

Filling-in and Suppression of Visual Perception from Context: a Bayesian Account of Perceptual Biases by Contextual Influences

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Feb 20
PMID 18282080
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual object recognition and sensitivity to image features are largely influenced by contextual inputs. We study influences by contextual bars on the bias to perceive or infer the presence of a target bar, rather than on the sensitivity to image features. Human observers judged from a briefly presented stimulus whether a target bar of a known orientation and shape is present at the center of a display, given a weak or missing input contrast at the target location with or without a context of other bars. Observers are more likely to perceive a target when the context has a weaker rather than stronger contrast. When the context can perceptually group well with the would-be target, weak contrast contextual bars bias the observers to perceive a target relative to the condition without contexts, as if to fill in the target. Meanwhile, high-contrast contextual bars, regardless of whether they group well with the target, bias the observers to perceive no target. A Bayesian model of visual inference is shown to account for the data well, illustrating that the context influences the perception in two ways: (1) biasing observers' prior belief that a target should be present according to visual grouping principles, and (2) biasing observers' internal model of the likely input contrasts caused by a target bar. According to this model, our data suggest that the context does not influence the perceived target contrast despite its influence on the bias to perceive the target's presence, thereby suggesting that cortical areas beyond the primary visual cortex are responsible for the visual inferences.

Citing Articles

Isolating objective and subjective filling-in using the drift diffusion model.

Dekel R, Sagi D, Zomet A, Levi D, Polat U J Vis. 2023; 23(14):5.

PMID: 38108790 PMC: 10732087. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.14.5.


Inference via sparse coding in a hierarchical vision model.

Bowren J, Sanchez-Giraldo L, Schwartz O J Vis. 2022; 22(2):19.

PMID: 35212744 PMC: 8883180. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.2.19.


The perceptual saliency of fearful eyes and smiles: A signal detection study.

Elsherif M, Sahan M, Rotshtein P PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173199.

PMID: 28267761 PMC: 5340363. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173199.


On the rules of integration of crowded orientation signals.

Poder E Iperception. 2012; 3(7):440-54.

PMID: 23145295 PMC: 3485841. DOI: 10.1068/i0412.


Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion.

Schwartz O, Sejnowski T, Dayan P J Vis. 2009; 9(4):19.1-20.

PMID: 19757928 PMC: 2852324. DOI: 10.1167/9.4.19.

References
1.
Polat U, Mizobe K, Pettet M, Kasamatsu T, Norcia A . Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature. 1998; 391(6667):580-4. DOI: 10.1038/35372. View

2.
Bakin J, Nakayama K, Gilbert C . Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(21):8188-98. PMC: 6772714. View

3.
van Lier R, Wagemans J . Perceptual grouping measured by color assimilation: regularity versus proximity. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998; 97(1):37-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00023-1. View

4.
WEHRHAHN C, Dresp B . Detection facilitation by collinear stimuli in humans: dependence on strength and sign of contrast. Vision Res. 1998; 38(3):423-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00141-7. View

5.
Solomon J, WATSON A, Morgan M . Transducer model produces facilitation from opposite-sign flanks. Vision Res. 1999; 39(5):987-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00143-6. View