» Articles » PMID: 18227506

Transitive Homology-guided Structural Studies Lead to Discovery of Cro Proteins with 40% Sequence Identity but Different Folds

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Jan 30
PMID 18227506
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Proteins that share common ancestry may differ in structure and function because of divergent evolution of their amino acid sequences. For a typical diverse protein superfamily, the properties of a few scattered members are known from experiment. A satisfying picture of functional and structural evolution in relation to sequence changes, however, may require characterization of a larger, well chosen subset. Here, we employ a "stepping-stone" method, based on transitive homology, to target sequences intermediate between two related proteins with known divergent properties. We apply the approach to the question of how new protein folds can evolve from preexisting folds and, in particular, to an evolutionary change in secondary structure and oligomeric state in the Cro family of bacteriophage transcription factors, initially identified by sequence-structure comparison of distant homologs from phages P22 and lambda. We report crystal structures of two Cro proteins, Xfaso 1 and Pfl 6, with sequences intermediate between those of P22 and lambda. The domains show 40% sequence identity but differ by switching of alpha-helix to beta-sheet in a C-terminal region spanning approximately 25 residues. Sedimentation analysis also suggests a correlation between helix-to-sheet conversion and strengthened dimerization.

Citing Articles

Fluid protein fold space and its implications.

Porter L Bioessays. 2023; 45(9):e2300057.

PMID: 37431685 PMC: 10529699. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202300057.


Identification of a covert evolutionary pathway between two protein folds.

Chakravarty D, Sreenivasan S, Swint-Kruse L, Porter L Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):3177.

PMID: 37264049 PMC: 10235069. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38519-0.


A review of visualisations of protein fold networks and their relationship with sequence and function.

Sykes J, Holland B, Charleston M Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022; 98(1):243-262.

PMID: 36210328 PMC: 10092621. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12905.


A high-throughput predictive method for sequence-similar fold switchers.

Kim A, Looger L, Porter L Biopolymers. 2021; 112(10):e23416.

PMID: 33462801 PMC: 8404102. DOI: 10.1002/bip.23416.


Dynamic and conformational switching in proteins.

Scheraga H, Rackovsky S Biopolymers. 2020; 112(10):e23411.

PMID: 33270217 PMC: 8172660. DOI: 10.1002/bip.23411.


References
1.
Ohlendorf D, Tronrud D, Matthews B . Refined structure of Cro repressor protein from bacteriophage lambda suggests both flexibility and plasticity. J Mol Biol. 1998; 280(1):129-36. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1849. View

2.
Van Duyne G, Standaert R, Karplus P, Schreiber S, Clardy J . Atomic structures of the human immunophilin FKBP-12 complexes with FK506 and rapamycin. J Mol Biol. 1993; 229(1):105-24. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1012. View

3.
Andreeva A, Murzin A . Evolution of protein fold in the presence of functional constraints. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006; 16(3):399-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.04.003. View

4.
Vander Byl C, Kropinski A . Sequence of the genome of Salmonella bacteriophage P22. J Bacteriol. 2000; 182(22):6472-81. PMC: 94795. DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.22.6472-6481.2000. View

5.
Terwilliger T . SOLVE and RESOLVE: automated structure solution, density modification and model building. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2003; 11(Pt 1):49-52. DOI: 10.1107/s0909049503023938. View