» Articles » PMID: 18196794

Image Quality and Localization Accuracy in C-arm Tomosynthesis-guided Head and Neck Surgery

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2008 Jan 17
PMID 18196794
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The image quality and localization accuracy for C-arm tomosynthesis and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance of head and neck surgery were investigated. A continuum in image acquisition was explored, ranging from a single exposure (radiograph) to multiple projections acquired over a limited arc (tomosynthesis) to a full semicircular trajectory (CBCT). Experiments were performed using a prototype mobile C-arm modified to perform 3D image acquisition (a modified Siemens PowerMobil). The tradeoffs in image quality associated with the extent of the source-detector arc (theta(tot)), the number of projection views, and the total imaging dose were evaluated in phantom and cadaver studies. Surgical localization performance was evaluated using three cadaver heads imaged as a function of theta(tot). Six localization tasks were considered, ranging from high-contrast feature identification (e.g., tip of a K-wire pointer) to more challenging soft-tissue delineation (e.g., junction of the hard and soft palate). Five head and neck surgeons and one radiologist participated as observers. For each localization task, the 3D coordinates of landmarks pinpointed by each observer were analyzed as a function of theta(tot). For all tomosynthesis angles, image quality was highest in the coronal plane, whereas sagittal and axial planes exhibited a substantial decrease in spatial resolution associated with out-of-plane blur and distortion. Tasks involving complex, lower-contrast features demonstrated steeper degradation with smaller tomosynthetic arc. Localization accuracy in the coronal plane was correspondingly high, maintained to < 3 mm down to theta(tot) approximately 30 degrees, whereas sagittal and axial localization degraded rapidly below theta(tot) approximately 60 degrees. Similarly, localization precision was better than approximately 1 mm within the coronal plane, compared to approximately 2-3 mm out-of-plane for tomosynthesis angles below theta(tot) approximately 45 degrees. An overall 3D localization accuracy of approximately 2.5 mm was achieved with theta(tot) approximately 90 degrees for most tasks. The high in-plane spatial resolution, short scanning time, and low radiation dose characteristic of tomosynthesis may enable the surgeon to collect near real-time images throughout the procedure with minimal interference to surgical workflow. Therefore, tomosynthesis could provide a useful addition to the image-guided surgery arsenal, providing on-demand, high quality image updates, complemented by CBCT at critical milestones in the surgical procedure.

Citing Articles

Two-phase learning-based 3D deblurring method for digital breast tomosynthesis images.

Choi Y, Han M, Jang H, Shim H, Baek J PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262736.

PMID: 35073353 PMC: 8786177. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262736.


Assessment of Position Repeatability Error in an Electromagnetic Tracking System for Surgical Navigation.

Andria G, Attivissimo F, Di Nisio A, Lanzolla A, Ragolia M Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(4).

PMID: 32053941 PMC: 7070586. DOI: 10.3390/s20040961.


Integration of free-hand 3D ultrasound and mobile C-arm cone-beam CT: Feasibility and characterization for real-time guidance of needle insertion.

Marinetto E, Uneri A, De Silva T, Reaungamornrat S, Zbijewski W, Sisniega A Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017; 58:13-22.

PMID: 28414927 PMC: 9097947. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.03.003.


Utility of the LevelCheck Algorithm for Decision Support in Vertebral Localization.

de Silva T, Lo S, Aygun N, Aghion D, Boah A, Petteys R Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(20):E1249-E1256.

PMID: 27035579 PMC: 5045321. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001589.


ℓ0 Gradient Minimization Based Image Reconstruction for Limited-Angle Computed Tomography.

Yu W, Zeng L PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0130793.

PMID: 26158543 PMC: 4497654. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130793.