Efficient Low-power Heteronuclear Decoupling in 13C High-resolution Solid-state NMR Under Fast Magic Angle Spinning
Overview
Affiliations
The use of a low-power two-pulse phase modulation (TPPM) sequence is proposed for efficient (1)H radio frequency (rf) decoupling in high-resolution (13)C solid-state NMR (SSNMR) under fast MAS conditions. Decoupling efficiency for different low-power decoupling sequences such as continuous-wave (cw), TPPM, XiX, and π-pulse (PIPS) train decoupling has been investigated at a spinning speed of 40 kHz for (13)C CPMAS spectra of uniformly (13)C- and (15)N-labeled L-alanine. It was found that the TPPM decoupling sequence, which was originally designed for high-power decoupling, provides the best decoupling efficiency at low power among all the low-power decoupling sequences examined here. Optimum performance of the low-power TPPM sequence was found to be obtained at a decoupling field intensity (ω(1)) of ~ω(R)/4 with a pulse flip angle of ~π and a phase alternation between ± [Symbol: see text]([Symbol: see text] = 20° ), where ω(R)/2π is the spinning speed. The sensitivity obtained for (13) CO(2)(-), (13)CH, and (13)CH(3) in L-alanine under low-power TPPM at ω(1)/2π of 10 kHz was only 5-15% less than that under high-power TPPM at ω(1) /2π of 200 kHz, despite the fact that only 0.25% of the rf power was required in low-power TPPM. Analysis of the (13)CH(2) signals for uniformly (13) C- and (15) N-labeled L-isoleucine under various low-power decoupling sequences also confirmed superior performance of the low-power TPPM sequence, although the intensity obtained by low-power TPPM was 61% of that obtained by high-power TPPM. (13)C CPMAS spectra of (13)C-labeled ubiquitin micro crystals obtained by low-power TPPM demonstrates that the low-power TPPM sequence is a practical option that provides excellent resolution and sensitivity in (13)C SSNMR for hydrated proteins.
Ray A, Jin B, Eddy M bioRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 39464034 PMC: 11507675. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.14.618237.
Nishiyama Y, Hou G, Agarwal V, Su Y, Ramamoorthy A Chem Rev. 2022; 123(3):918-988.
PMID: 36542732 PMC: 10319395. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00197.
Porat-Dahlerbruch G, Struppe J, Quinn C, Gronenborn A, Polenova T Solid State Nucl Magn Reson. 2022; 122:101831.
PMID: 36182713 PMC: 10280467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2022.101831.
Porat-Dahlerbruch G, Struppe J, Quinn C, Gronenborn A, Polenova T J Magn Reson. 2022; 340:107227.
PMID: 35568013 PMC: 10280466. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107227.
Urban J, Ho J, Piester G, Fu R, Nilsson B Molecules. 2019; 24(10).
PMID: 31126069 PMC: 6571685. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101983.