» Articles » PMID: 18087583

Electrochemical Sensors for the Detection of Lead and Other Toxic Heavy Metals: the Next Generation of Personal Exposure Biomonitors

Overview
Date 2007 Dec 19
PMID 18087583
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To support the development and implementation of biological monitoring programs, we need quantitative technologies for measuring xenobiotic exposure. Microanalytical based sensors that work with complex biomatrices such as blood, urine, or saliva are being developed and validated and will improve our ability to make definitive associations between chemical exposures and disease. Among toxic metals, lead continues to be one of the most problematic. Despite considerable efforts to identify and eliminate Pb exposure sources, this metal remains a significant health concern, particularly for young children. Ongoing research focuses on the development of portable metal analyzers that have many advantages over current available technologies, thus potentially representing the next generation of toxic metal analyzers. In this article, we highlight the development and validation of two classes of metal analyzers for the voltammetric detection of Pb, including: a) an analyzer based on flow injection analysis and anodic stripping voltammetry at a mercury-film electrode, and b) Hg-free metal analyzers employing adsorptive stripping voltammetry and novel nanostructure materials that include the self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports and carbon nanotubes. These sensors have been optimized to detect Pb in urine, blood, and saliva as accurately as the state-of-the-art inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry with high reproducibility, and sensitivity allows. These improved and portable analytical sensor platforms will facilitate our ability to conduct biological monitoring programs to understand the relationship between chemical exposure assessment and disease outcomes.

Citing Articles

Electrochemical Sensors for Heavy Metal Ion Detection in Aqueous Medium: A Systematic Review.

Sulthana S, Iqbal U, Suseela S, Anbazhagan R, Chinthaginjala R, Chitathuru D ACS Omega. 2024; 9(24):25493-25512.

PMID: 38911761 PMC: 11190924. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c00933.


Screen-Printed Sensors Modified with Nafion and Mesoporous Carbon for Electrochemical Detection of Lead in Blood.

Boselli E, Wu Z, Haynes E, Papautsky I J Electrochem Soc. 2024; 171(2):027513.

PMID: 38357555 PMC: 10862559. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ad2397.


Graphene Pseudoreference Electrode for the Development of a Practical Paper-Based Electrochemical Heavy Metal Sensor.

Ruengpirasiri P, Charoensin P, Aniwattapong A, Natekuekool P, Srisomwat C, Pinyorospathum C ACS Omega. 2024; 9(1):1634-1642.

PMID: 38222522 PMC: 10785785. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c08249.


Design, synthesis, and density functional theory studies of a new selective chemosensor for Pb.

Hadi H, Bouzid G, Nasr S, Ghalla H, Ben Chaabane R, Ayachi S Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e20206.

PMID: 37809941 PMC: 10559993. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20206.


Characterization of Factors Affecting Stripping Voltammetry on Thermoplastic Electrodes.

McMahon C, Martinez B, Henry C J Electrochem Soc. 2023; 170(9).

PMID: 37807977 PMC: 10552556. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acfa68.


References
1.
Juberg D, Kleiman C, Kwon S . Position paper of the American Council on Science and Health: lead and human health. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1998; 38(3):162-80. DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1997.1591. View

2.
Honeychurch K, Hawkins D, Hart J, Cowell D . Voltammetric behaviour and trace determination of copper at a mercury-free screen-printed carbon electrode. Talanta. 2008; 57(3):565-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-9140(02)00060-7. View

3.
OFlaherty E . Physiologically based models of metal kinetics. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1998; 28(3):271-317. DOI: 10.1080/10408449891344209. View

4.
Erickson L, Thompson T . A review of a preventable poison: pediatric lead poisoning. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2005; 10(4):171-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2005.00034.x. View

5.
Christensen J . Human exposure to toxic metals: factors influencing interpretation of biomonitoring results. Sci Total Environ. 1995; 166:89-135. DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04478-j. View