» Articles » PMID: 18077390

Genomic Drift and Copy Number Variation of Sensory Receptor Genes in Humans

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Dec 14
PMID 18077390
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The number of sensory receptor genes varies extensively among different mammalian species. This variation is believed to be caused partly by physiological requirements of animals and partly by genomic drift due to random duplication and deletion of genes. If the contribution of genomic drift is substantial, each species should contain a significant amount of copy number variation (CNV). We therefore investigated CNVs in sensory receptor genes among 270 healthy humans by using published CNV data. The results indicated that olfactory receptor (OR), taste receptor type 2, and vomeronasal receptor type 1 genes show a high level of intraspecific CNVs. In particular, >30% of the approximately 800 OR gene loci in humans were polymorphic with respect to copy number, and two randomly chosen individuals showed a copy number difference of approximately 11 in functional OR genes on average. There was no significant difference in the amount of CNVs between functional and nonfunctional OR genes. Because pseudogenes are expected to evolve in a neutral fashion, this observation suggests that functional OR genes also have evolved in a similar manner with respect to copy number change. In addition, we found that the evolutionary change of copy number of OR genes approximately follows the Gaussian process in probability theory, and the copy number divergence between populations has increased with evolutionary time. We therefore conclude that genomic drift plays an important role for generating intra- and interspecific CNVs of sensory receptor genes. Similar results were obtained when all annotated genes were analyzed.

Citing Articles

Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse and human primordial germ cells.

Lee S, Surani M Exp Mol Med. 2024; 56(12):2578-2587.

PMID: 39672813 PMC: 11671582. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-024-01359-z.


MYB transcription factors, their regulation and interactions with non-coding RNAs during drought stress in Brassica juncea.

Balhara R, Verma D, Kaur R, Singh K BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):999.

PMID: 39448923 PMC: 11515528. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05736-8.


Advancements in copy number variation screening in herbivorous livestock genomes and their association with phenotypic traits.

Liu X, Chen W, Huang B, Wang X, Peng Y, Zhang X Front Vet Sci. 2024; 10:1334434.

PMID: 38274664 PMC: 10808162. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1334434.


Evolution of five environmentally responsive gene families in a pine-feeding sawfly, (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae).

Vertacnik K, Herrig D, Godfrey R, Hill T, Geib S, Unckless R Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(10):e10506.

PMID: 37791292 PMC: 10542623. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10506.


Genome annotation: From human genetics to biodiversity genomics.

Guigo R Cell Genom. 2023; 3(8):100375.

PMID: 37601977 PMC: 10435374. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100375.


References
1.
Nam J, Nei M . Evolutionary change of the numbers of homeobox genes in bilateral animals. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 22(12):2386-94. PMC: 1464090. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi229. View

2.
Niimura Y, Nei M . Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(21):12235-40. PMC: 218742. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1635157100. View

3.
Tuzun E, Sharp A, Bailey J, Kaul R, Morrison V, Pertz L . Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2005; 37(7):727-32. DOI: 10.1038/ng1562. View

4.
Vigilant L, Stoneking M, Harpending H, Hawkes K, Wilson A . African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA. Science. 1991; 253(5027):1503-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1840702. View

5.
Lin Z, Kong H, Nei M, Ma H . Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family: evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(27):10328-10333. PMC: 1502457. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604232103. View