» Articles » PMID: 16079247

Evolutionary Change of the Numbers of Homeobox Genes in Bilateral Animals

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Aug 5
PMID 16079247
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been known that the conservation or diversity of homeobox genes is responsible for the similarity and variability of some of the morphological or physiological characters among different organisms. To gain some insights into the evolutionary pattern of homeobox genes in bilateral animals, we studied the change of the numbers of these genes during the evolution of bilateral animals. We analyzed 2,031 homeodomain sequences compiled from 11 species of bilateral animals ranging from Caenorhabditis elegans to humans. Our phylogenetic analysis using a modified reconciled-tree method suggested that there were at least about 88 homeobox genes in the common ancestor of bilateral animals. About 50-60 genes of them have left at least one descendant gene in each of the 11 species studied, suggesting that about 30-40 genes were lost in a lineage-specific manner. Although similar numbers of ancestral genes have survived in each species, vertebrate lineages gained many more genes by duplication than invertebrate lineages, resulting in more than 200 homeobox genes in vertebrates and about 100 in invertebrates. After these gene duplications, a substantial number of old duplicate genes have also been lost in each lineage. Because many old duplicate genes were lost, it is likely that lost genes had already been differentiated from other groups of genes at the time of gene loss. We conclude that both gain and loss of homeobox genes were important for the evolutionary change of phenotypic characters in bilateral animals.

Citing Articles

Wide-scale identification of novel/eliminated genes responsible for evolutionary transformations.

Lyubetsky V, Rubanov L, Tereshina M, Ivanova A, Araslanova K, Uroshlev L Biol Direct. 2023; 18(1):45.

PMID: 37568147 PMC: 10416458. DOI: 10.1186/s13062-023-00405-6.


Evaluating the Expression of Candidate Homeobox Genes and Their Role in Local-Site Inflammation in Mucosal Tissue Obtained from Children with Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate.

Jain N, Pilmane M J Pers Med. 2021; 11(11).

PMID: 34834487 PMC: 8618679. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111135.


Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of Soybean Mutant and Functional Evaluation of a Homeodomain-Leucine Zipper (HD-Zip) I Gene .

Yang H, Yang Z, Mao Z, Li Y, Hu D, Li X Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11:593999.

PMID: 33505408 PMC: 7830220. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.593999.


Origins and Evolution of Cuticle Biosynthetic Machinery in Land Plants.

Kong L, Liu Y, Zhi P, Wang X, Xu B, Gong Z Plant Physiol. 2020; 184(4):1998-2010.

PMID: 32934149 PMC: 7723097. DOI: 10.1104/pp.20.00913.


Major Revisions in Arthropod Phylogeny Through Improved Supermatrix, With Support for Two Possible Waves of Land Invasion by Chelicerates.

Noah K, Hao J, Li L, Sun X, Foley B, Yang Q Evol Bioinform Online. 2020; 16:1176934320903735.

PMID: 32076367 PMC: 7003163. DOI: 10.1177/1176934320903735.


References
1.
Zhang J, Nei M . Evolution of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes. Genetics. 1996; 142(1):295-303. PMC: 1206958. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/142.1.295. View

2.
Wolf Y, Rogozin I, Koonin E . Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. Genome Res. 2004; 14(1):29-36. PMC: 314272. DOI: 10.1101/gr.1347404. View

3.
Ruddle F, Bentley K, Murtha M, Risch N . Gene loss and gain in the evolution of the vertebrates. Dev Suppl. 1994; :155-61. View

4.
Page R, Charleston M . From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997; 7(2):231-40. DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0390. View

5.
Kappen C . Analysis of a complete homeobox gene repertoire: implications for the evolution of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(9):4481-6. PMC: 18260. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4481. View