» Articles » PMID: 18077247

Design Principles for Phase-splitting Behaviour of Coupled Cellular Oscillators: Clues from Hamsters with 'split' Circadian Rhythms

Overview
Date 2007 Dec 14
PMID 18077247
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nonlinear interactions among coupled cellular oscillators are likely to underlie a variety of complex rhythmic behaviours. Here we consider the case of one such behaviour, a doubling of rhythm frequency caused by the spontaneous splitting of a population of synchronized oscillators into two subgroups each oscillating in anti-phase (phase-splitting). An example of biological phase-splitting is the frequency doubling of the circadian locomotor rhythm in hamsters housed in constant light, in which the pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is reconfigured with its left and right halves oscillating in anti-phase. We apply the theory of coupled phase oscillators to show that stable phase-splitting requires the presence of negative coupling terms, through delayed and/or inhibitory interactions. We also find that the inclusion of real biological constraints (that the SCN contains a finite number of non-identical noisy oscillators) implies the existence of an underlying non-uniform network architecture, in which the population of oscillators must interact through at least two types of connections. We propose that a key design principle for the frequency doubling of a population of biological oscillators is inhomogeneity of oscillator coupling.

Citing Articles

The seasons within: a theoretical perspective on photoperiodic entrainment and encoding.

Schmal C J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2023; 210(4):549-564.

PMID: 37659985 PMC: 11226496. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-023-01669-z.


Synchronization, clustering, and weak chimeras in a densely coupled transcription-based oscillator model for split circadian rhythms.

Luis Ocampo-Espindola J, Nikhil K, Li J, Herzog E, Kiss I Chaos. 2023; 33(8).

PMID: 37535024 PMC: 10403273. DOI: 10.1063/5.0156135.


Network Structure of the Master Clock Is Important for Its Primary Function.

Gu C, Li J, Zhou J, Yang H, Rohling J Front Physiol. 2021; 12:678391.

PMID: 34483953 PMC: 8415478. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.678391.


Nonlinear phenomena in models of the circadian clock.

van Soest I, Del Olmo M, Schmal C, Herzel H J R Soc Interface. 2020; 17(170):20200556.

PMID: 32993432 PMC: 7536064. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0556.


Two-Community Noisy Kuramoto Model Suggests Mechanism for Splitting in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.

Rohling J, Meylahn J J Biol Rhythms. 2020; 35(2):158-166.

PMID: 31969025 PMC: 7031819. DOI: 10.1177/0748730419898314.


References
1.
Pavlidis T . Populations of biochemical oscillators as circadian clocks. J Theor Biol. 1971; 33(2):319-38. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90070-1. View

2.
Kunz H, Achermann P . Simulation of circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus with locally coupled self-sustained oscillators. J Theor Biol. 2003; 224(1):63-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00141-3. View

3.
Herzog E, Takahashi J, Block G . Clock controls circadian period in isolated suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 1(8):708-13. DOI: 10.1038/3708. View

4.
To T, Henson M, Herzog E, Doyle 3rd F . A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock. Biophys J. 2007; 92(11):3792-803. PMC: 1868999. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.094086. View

5.
Sim C, Forger D . Modeling the electrophysiology of suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. J Biol Rhythms. 2007; 22(5):445-53. DOI: 10.1177/0748730407306041. View