» Articles » PMID: 18046000

What Do Synergies Do? Effects of Secondary Constraints on Multidigit Synergies in Accurate Force-production Tasks

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2007 Nov 30
PMID 18046000
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used the framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis to explore changes in the structure of variability in multifinger force-production tasks when a secondary task was introduced. Healthy young subjects produced several levels of the total force by pressing with the four fingers of the hand on force sensors. The frame with the sensors rested on the table (Stable condition) or on a narrow supporting beam (Unstable conditions) that could be placed between different finger pairs. Most variance in the finger mode space was compatible with a fixed value of the total force across all conditions, whereas the patterns of sharing of the total force among the fingers were condition dependent. Moment of force was stabilized only in the Unstable conditions. The finger mode data were projected onto the UCM computed for the total force and subjected to principal component (PC) analysis. Two PCs accounted for >90% of the variance. The directions of the PC vectors varied across subjects in the Stable condition, whereas two "default" PCs were observed under the Unstable conditions. These observations show that different persons coordinate their fingers differently in force-production tasks. They converge on similar solutions when an additional constraint is introduced. The use of variable solutions allows avoiding a loss in accuracy of performance when the same elements get involved in another task. Our results suggest a mechanism underlying the principle of superposition suggested in a variety of human and robotic studies.

Citing Articles

Abnormal coordination of upper extremity during target reaching in persons post stroke.

Koh K, Oppizzi G, Kehs G, Zhang L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12838.

PMID: 37553412 PMC: 10409717. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39684-4.


Dance training improves the CNS's ability to utilize the redundant degrees of freedom of the whole body.

Koh K, Park Y, Park D, Shim J Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):22197.

PMID: 33335153 PMC: 7747644. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79081-9.


Older but not younger adults rely on multijoint coordination to stabilize the swinging limb when performing a novel cued walking task.

Rosenblatt N, Eckardt N, Kuhman D, Hurt C Exp Brain Res. 2020; 238(6):1441-1454.

PMID: 32385736 PMC: 7303923. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05822-x.


Stroke survivors exhibit stronger lower extremity synergies in more challenging walking conditions.

Shafizadeh M, Wheat J, Kelley J, Nourian R Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(8):1919-1930.

PMID: 31106386 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05560-9.


Differential control of task and null space variability in response to changes in task difficulty when learning a bimanual steering task.

Lokesh R, Ranganathan R Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(4):1045-1055.

PMID: 30739135 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05486-2.


References
1.
Zatsiorsky V, Gao F, Latash M . Prehension synergies: effects of object geometry and prescribed torques. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 148(1):77-87. PMC: 2827181. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1278-3. View

2.
Ruegg D, Bongioanni F . Superposition of ballistic on steady contractions in man. Exp Brain Res. 1989; 77(2):412-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00274999. View

3.
Schoner G, Scholz J . Analyzing variance in multi-degree-of-freedom movements: uncovering structure versus extracting correlations. Motor Control. 2007; 11(3):259-75. DOI: 10.1123/mcj.11.3.259. View

4.
Latash M, Anson J . Synergies in health and disease: relations to adaptive changes in motor coordination. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(8):1151-60. View

5.
Shim J, Latash M, Zatsiorsky V . Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 152(2):173-84. PMC: 2821085. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1527-0. View