» Articles » PMID: 28674489

Multi-Finger Interaction and Synergies in Finger Flexion and Extension Force Production

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jul 5
PMID 28674489
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to discover finger interaction indices during single-finger ramp tasks and multi-finger coordination during a steady state force production in two directions, flexion, and extension. Furthermore, the indices of anticipatory adjustment of elemental variables (i.e., finger forces) prior to a quick pulse force production were quantified. It is currently unknown whether the organization and anticipatory modulation of stability properties are affected by force directions and strengths of in multi-finger actions. We expected to observe a smaller finger independency and larger indices of multi-finger coordination during extension than during flexion due to both neural and peripheral differences between the finger flexion and extension actions. We also examined the indices of the anticipatory adjustment between different force direction conditions. The anticipatory adjustment could be a neural process, which may be affected by the properties of the muscles and by the direction of the motions. The maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force was larger for flexion than for extension, which confirmed the fact that the strength of finger flexor muscles (e.g., flexor digitorum profundus) was larger than that of finger extensor (e.g., extensor digitorum). The analysis within the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis was used to quantify the motor synergy of elemental variables by decomposing two sources of variances across repetitive trials, which identifies the variances in the uncontrolled manifold () and that are orthogonal to the UCM (V). The presence of motor synergy and its strength were quantified by the relative amount of and V. The strength of motor synergies at the steady state was larger in the extension condition, which suggests that the stability property (i.e., multi-finger synergies) may be a direction specific quantity. However, the results for the existence of anticipatory adjustment; however, no difference between the directional conditions suggests that feed-forward synergy adjustment (changes in the stability property) may be at least independent of the magnitude of the task-specific apparent performance variables and its direction (e.g., flexion and extension forces).

Citing Articles

Bio-Inspired Control System for Fingers Actuated by Multiple SMA Actuators.

Uleru G, Hulea M, Burlacu A Biomimetics (Basel). 2022; 7(2).

PMID: 35645189 PMC: 9149821. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7020062.


Frequency-Dependent Effects on Coordination and Prefrontal Hemodynamics During Finger Force Production Tasks.

Xu D, Shin N, Lee S, Park J Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:721679.

PMID: 34733144 PMC: 8558484. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.721679.


Neural mechanism of selective finger movement independent of synergistic movement.

Aoyama T, Kaneko F, Ohashi Y, Kohno Y Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(12):3485-3492.

PMID: 31741000 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05693-x.


Effects of spastic cerebral palsy on multi-finger coordination during isometric force production tasks.

Kong J, Kim K, Joung H, Chung C, Park J Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(12):3281-3295.

PMID: 31664488 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05671-3.


Expectation of movement generates contrasting changes in multifinger synergies in young and older adults.

Tillman M, Ambike S Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(10):2765-2780.

PMID: 30022260 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5333-0.


References
1.
Lang C, Schieber M . Human finger independence: limitations due to passive mechanical coupling versus active neuromuscular control. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(5):2802-10. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00480.2004. View

2.
Krishnan V, Aruin A, Latash M . Two stages and three components of the postural preparation to action. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 212(1):47-63. PMC: 3732002. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2694-z. View

3.
Shim J, Latash M, Zatsiorsky V . Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 152(2):173-84. PMC: 2821085. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1527-0. View

4.
Klous M, Mikulic P, Latash M . Two aspects of feedforward postural control: anticipatory postural adjustments and anticipatory synergy adjustments. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105(5):2275-88. PMC: 3094180. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00665.2010. View

5.
Chye L, Nosaka K, Murray L, Edwards D, Thickbroom G . Corticomotor excitability of wrist flexor and extensor muscles during active and passive movement. Hum Mov Sci. 2010; 29(4):494-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.03.003. View