» Articles » PMID: 18038061

Identifying Barriers and Facilitators Towards Implementing Guidelines to Reduce Caesarean Section Rates in Quebec

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Nov 27
PMID 18038061
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate obstetricians perceptions of clinical practice guidelines targeting management of labour and vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth, and to identify the barriers to, facilitators of and obstetricians solutions for implementing these guidelines in practice.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in three hospitals in Montreal that represent around 10% of births in Quebec. Data was collected from 10 focus groups, followed by six semi-structured interviews. Two researchers jointly analysed the verbatim transcripts according to A manual for the use of focus groups.

Findings: The identified barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of guidelines can be classified into four categories: 1) the hospital level, including management and hospital policies; 2) the departmental level, including local policies, leadership, organizational factors, economic incentive, and availability of equipment and staff; 3) the health professionals motivations and attitudes, including medico-legal concerns, skill levels, acceptance of guidelines and strategies used to implement recommendations; and 4) patients motivations.

Conclusion: Identifying the barriers to and facilitators of the adoption of recommendations is an important way to guide the development of efficient strategies. The findings of this study suggest that the adoption of guidelines may be improved if local health professionals perceptions are considered to make recommendations more acceptable and useful. Our findings also support the assumption that obstetricians seek to implement best practices, but require evidence tools and support to assess their practices and enhance their performance. In addition, peer review activities championed by opinion leaders have been identified by obstetricians as the most suitable strategy to improve the use of the guidelines in their practices.

Citing Articles

Behavioural factors associated with fear of litigation as a driver for the increased use of caesarean sections: a scoping review.

Elaraby S, Altieri E, Downe S, Erdman J, Mannava S, Moncrieff G BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e070454.

PMID: 37076154 PMC: 10124311. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070454.


Spatial and hierarchical Bayesian analysis to identify factors associated with caesarean delivery use in Ethiopia: Evidence from national population and health facility data.

Tegegne T, Chojenta C, Getachew T, Smith R, Loxton D PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277885.

PMID: 36395274 PMC: 9671448. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277885.


Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study.

Colomar M, Colistro V, Sosa C, de Francisco L, Betran A, Serruya S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):471.

PMID: 35672663 PMC: 9175367. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y.


Improving the Caesarean Decision by Robson Classification: A Population-Based Study by 5,323,500 Livebirth Data.

Tontus H, Nebioglu S Ann Glob Health. 2020; 86(1):101.

PMID: 32874932 PMC: 7442169. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2615.


Clinician's and women's perceptions of individual barriers to vaginal birth after cesarean in Iran: A qualitative inquiry.

Firoozi M, Tara F, Ahanchian M, Latifnejad Roudsari R Caspian J Intern Med. 2020; 11(3):259-266.

PMID: 32874432 PMC: 7442460. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.11.3.259.


References
1.
Nigenda G, Langer A, Kuchaisit C, Romero M, Rojas G, Al-Osimy M . Womens' opinions on antenatal care in developing countries: results of a study in Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina. BMC Public Health. 2003; 3:17. PMC: 166129. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-17. View

2.
. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985; 2(8452):436-7. View

3.
Yana R, Jo R . Getting guidelines into practice: a literature review. Nurs Stand. 2004; 18(50):33-40. DOI: 10.7748/ns2004.08.18.50.33.c3677. View

4.
Hibbard J, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail M . Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.115044. View

5.
Bick D . Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health: commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006; 1(3):198-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04060.x. View