» Articles » PMID: 17991555

Effect of Biofeedback Treatment on Spinning Top Urethra in Children with Voiding Dysfunction

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2007 Nov 10
PMID 17991555
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Spinning top urethra (STU) deformity arises secondary to detrusor instability, leading to an increase in the intravesical pressure against a closed sphincter. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of biofeedback treatment on STU in children with dysfunctional voiding.

Methods: A total of 121 patients with STU and voiding dysfunction were enrolled in this study. The patients divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 49) were treated with simple bladder retraining with timed voiding, and group 2 (n = 72) were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 and 12 month later to determine the status of the STU after both therapies.

Results: The patient age range was 5 to 13 years (mean 8.1 +/- 1.9) in group 1 and 5 to 13 years (mean 8.2 +/- 1.7) in group 2. Group 1 consisted of 41 girls and 8 boys; group 2 consisted of 63 girls and 9 boys. Voiding cystourethrography revealed vesicoureteral reflux in 39 and 59 children in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The improvement rates of the biofeedback therapy in children with STU and vesicoureteral reflux were significantly greater than the children treated with timed voiding at 6 months and 1-year of follow-up.

Conclusions: For children admitted to urology clinics with urinary infection or complaints thought to be an unstable urinary bladder, proximal urethral dilation called STU is detected at a high frequency. It should be remembered that this situation can be related to vesicoureteral reflux and urinary bladder instability. Biofeedback training is a simple, effective, and well-tolerated treatment modality for these children.

Citing Articles

The Engagement of the Pelvic Floor Muscles to the Urethra, Does Variation in Point of Action Exist?.

van Geen F, de Jong H, de Jong T, de Mooij K Front Pediatr. 2020; 7:522.

PMID: 31970143 PMC: 6960168. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00522.


Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?.

Altunkol A, Abat D, Sener N, Gulum M, Ciftci H, Savas M Int Braz J Urol. 2018; 44(5):987-995.

PMID: 30130020 PMC: 6237517. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0194.


Can a four-session biofeedback regimen be used effectively for treating children with dysfunctional voiding?.

Sener N, Altunkol A, Unal U, Ercil H, Bas O, Gumus K Int Urol Nephrol. 2014; 47(1):5-9.

PMID: 25218618 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0837-4.


Dysfunctional voiding: A review of the terminology, presentation, evaluation and management in children and adults.

Sinha S Indian J Urol. 2012; 27(4):437-47.

PMID: 22279306 PMC: 3263208. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.91429.


Biofeedback therapy for dysfunctional voiding in children.

Koenig J, McKenna P Curr Urol Rep. 2011; 12(2):144-52.

PMID: 21213078 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-010-0166-9.