» Articles » PMID: 17988385

Gene Expression Atlas of the Mouse Central Nervous System: Impact and Interactions of Age, Energy Intake and Gender

Overview
Journal Genome Biol
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2007 Nov 9
PMID 17988385
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The structural and functional complexity of the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) is organized and modified by complicated molecular signaling processes that are poorly understood.

Results: We measured transcripts of 16,896 genes in 5 CNS regions from cohorts of young, middle-aged and old male and female mice that had been maintained on either a control diet or a low energy diet known to retard aging. Each CNS region (cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum, cerebellum and spinal cord) possessed its own unique transcriptome fingerprint that was independent of age, gender and energy intake. Less than 10% of genes were significantly affected by age, diet or gender, with most of these changes occurring between middle and old age. The transcriptome of the spinal cord was the most responsive to age, diet and gender, while the striatal transcriptome was the least responsive. Gender and energy restriction had particularly robust influences on the hippocampal transcriptome of middle-aged mice. Prominent functional groups of age- and energy-sensitive genes were those encoding proteins involved in DNA damage responses (Werner and telomere-associated proteins), mitochondrial and proteasome functions, cell fate determination (Wnt and Notch signaling) and synaptic vesicle trafficking.

Conclusion: Mouse CNS transcriptomes responded to age, energy intake and gender in a regionally distinctive manner. The systematic transcriptome dataset also provides a window into mechanisms of age-, diet- and sex-related CNS plasticity and vulnerability.

Citing Articles

Gene expression changes in cerebellum induced by dietary restriction.

Vant Sant L, Birkisdottir M, Ozinga R, Gyenis A, Hoeijmakers J, Vermeij W Front Mol Neurosci. 2023; 16:1185665.

PMID: 37293544 PMC: 10244750. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1185665.


A post-transcriptional regulatory landscape of aging in the female mouse hippocampus.

Winsky-Sommerer R, King H, Iadevaia V, Moller-Levet C, Gerber A Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1119873.

PMID: 37122377 PMC: 10135431. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1119873.


Genetic and Epigenetic Sexual Dimorphism of Brain Cells during Aging.

Shirokova O, Zaborskaya O, Pchelin P, Kozliaeva E, Pershin V, Mukhina I Brain Sci. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36831738 PMC: 9954625. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020195.


Multi-omics analysis reveals neuroinflammation, activated glial signaling, and dysregulated synaptic signaling and metabolism in the hippocampus of aged mice.

Lu Y, Xu K, Lin D, Wang S, Fu R, Deng X Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:964429.

PMID: 36408109 PMC: 9669972. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.964429.


Sex Differences in Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Aging.

Dela Justina V, Miguez J, Priviero F, Sullivan J, Giachini F, Webb R Front Aging. 2022; 2:725884.

PMID: 35822017 PMC: 9261391. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2021.725884.


References
1.
Sandberg R, Yasuda R, Pankratz D, Carter T, Del Rio J, Wodicka L . Regional and strain-specific gene expression mapping in the adult mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(20):11038-43. PMC: 27144. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.20.11038. View

2.
Ross C, Poirier M . Opinion: What is the role of protein aggregation in neurodegeneration?. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 6(11):891-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrm1742. View

3.
Roth S, Ferrell R, Peters D, Metter E, Hurley B, Rogers M . Influence of age, sex, and strength training on human muscle gene expression determined by microarray. Physiol Genomics. 2002; 10(3):181-90. PMC: 2812433. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00028.2002. View

4.
Blasco M . Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6(8):611-22. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1656. View

5.
Pawitan Y, Murthy K, Michiels S, Ploner A . Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(20):3865-72. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti626. View