» Articles » PMID: 17983469

The Determinants of Gene Order Conservation in Yeasts

Overview
Journal Genome Biol
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2007 Nov 7
PMID 17983469
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Why do some groups of physically linked genes stay linked over long evolutionary periods? Although several factors are associated with the formation of gene clusters in eukaryotic genomes, the particular contribution of each feature to clustering maintenance remains unclear.

Results: We quantify the strength of the proposed factors in a yeast lineage. First we identify the magnitude of each variable to determine linkage conservation by using several comparator species at different distances to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For adjacent gene pairs, in line with null simulations, intergenic distance acts as the strongest covariate. Which of the other covariates appear important depends on the comparator, although high co-expression is related to synteny conservation commonly, especially in the more distant comparisons, these being expected to reveal strong but relatively rare selection. We also analyze those pairs that are immediate neighbors through all the lineages considered. Current intergene distance is again the best predictor, followed by the local density of essential genes and co-regulation, with co-expression and recombination rate being the weakest predictors. The genome duplication seen in yeast leaves some mark on linkage conservation, as adjacent pairs resolved as single copy in all post-whole genome duplication species are more often found as adjacent in pre-duplication species.

Conclusion: Current intergene distance is consistently the strongest predictor of synteny conservation as expected under a simple null model. Other variables are of lesser importance and their relevance depends both on the species comparison in question and the fate of the duplicates following genome duplication.

Citing Articles

Exploring microbial functional biodiversity at the protein family level-From metagenomic sequence reads to annotated protein clusters.

Baltoumas F, Karatzas E, Paez-Espino D, Venetsianou N, Aplakidou E, Oulas A Front Bioinform. 2023; 3:1157956.

PMID: 36959975 PMC: 10029925. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1157956.


Distinct chromosomal "niches" in the genome of provide the background for genomic innovation and shape the fate of gene duplicates.

Stavropoulou A, Tassios E, Kalyva M, Georgoulopoulos M, Vakirlis N, Iliopoulos I NAR Genom Bioinform. 2022; 4(4):lqac086.

PMID: 36381424 PMC: 9661399. DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqac086.


Trans-acting genetic variation affects the expression of adjacent genes.

Van Dyke K, Lutz S, Mekonnen G, Myers C, Albert F Genetics. 2021; 217(3).

PMID: 33789351 PMC: 8611878. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyaa051.


Recombination Rate Variation and Infrequent Sex Influence Genetic Diversity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Hasan A, Ness R Genome Biol Evol. 2020; 12(4):370-380.

PMID: 32181819 PMC: 7186780. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa057.


Patterns of diverse gene functions in genomic neighborhoods predict gene function and phenotype.

Mihelcic M, Smuc T, Supek F Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):19537.

PMID: 31863070 PMC: 6925100. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55984-0.


References
1.
Byrne K, Wolfe K . Visualizing syntenic relationships among the hemiascomycetes with the Yeast Gene Order Browser. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 34(Database issue):D452-5. PMC: 1347404. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj041. View

2.
Hurst L, Pal C, Lercher M . The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5(4):299-310. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1319. View

3.
Lercher M, Urrutia A, Hurst L . Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2002; 31(2):180-3. DOI: 10.1038/ng887. View

4.
Lercher M, Urrutia A, Pavlicek A, Hurst L . A unification of mosaic structures in the human genome. Hum Mol Genet. 2003; 12(19):2411-5. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddg251. View

5.
Hurst L, Williams E, Pal C . Natural selection promotes the conservation of linkage of co-expressed genes. Trends Genet. 2002; 18(12):604-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02813-5. View