» Articles » PMID: 17919603

Comparison of Spindle and Chromosome Configuration in in Vitro- and in Vivo-matured Mouse Oocytes After Vitrification

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2007 Oct 9
PMID 17919603
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the cytogenetic changes in in vitro- and in vivo-matured oocytes after vitrification.

Design: In vitro experiments using murine model.

Setting: Animal model study in university laboratory.

Animal(s): CD-1 mice.

Intervention(s): In vitro maturation and vitrification of oocytes.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Post-warming survival, analysis of spindle and chromosome configurations, aneuploidy screening of parthenogenetically activated oocytes, extent of DNA fragmentation, and early embryonic development after IVF.

Result(s): Eighty percent of germinal vesicle-stage oocytes matured after in vitro maturation and were cryopreserved by vitrification (n = 354). There was no significant difference in the post-warming survival of in vitro- and in vivo-matured oocytes (94.1% vs. 91.8%, respectively). The majority of in vitro- and in vivo-matured oocytes maintained normal meiotic spindle morphology and chromosome alignment (88.2% vs. 86.9%, respectively) after vitrification and the incidence of aneuploidy was not increased (11.5% vs. 9.3%). However, in vitro-matured oocytes showed a higher rate of DNA fragmentation after vitrification compared to in vivo-matured oocytes. After vitrification, the cleavage and blastocyst formation rates of in vitro-matured oocytes were significantly lower than those of in vivo-matured oocytes (37.0% vs. 60.0% and 5.4% vs. 18.9%, respectively).

Conclusion(s): Vitrification of in vitro-matured mouse oocytes results in high survival rates, normal meiotic spindle and chromosome alignment, and no increased incidence of aneuploidy. A possible cause of the reduced developmental competence of in vitro-matured and vitrified oocytes may be due to DNA fragmentation.

Citing Articles

Advanced Maternal Age Affects the Cryosusceptibility of Ovulated but not In Vitro Matured Mouse Oocytes.

Daddangadi A, Uppangala S, Kabekkodu S, Khan G N, Kalthur G, Talevi R Reprod Sci. 2024; 31(5):1420-1428.

PMID: 38294668 PMC: 11090971. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01462-6.


Morphokinetic parameters of mouse oocyte meiotic maturation and cumulus expansion are not affected by reproductive age or ploidy status.

Suebthawinkul C, Babayev E, Lee H, Duncan F J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(5):1197-1213.

PMID: 37012451 PMC: 10239409. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02779-y.


The live birth rate of vitrified oocyte accumulation for managing diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective cohort study.

Lee K, Lin M, Hwu Y, Yang J, Lee R J Ovarian Res. 2023; 16(1):49.

PMID: 36869354 PMC: 9983267. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01128-y.


Quantitative morphokinetic parameters identify novel dynamics of oocyte meiotic maturation and cumulus expansion†.

Suebthawinkul C, Babayev E, Zhou L, Lee H, Duncan F Biol Reprod. 2022; 107(4):1097-1112.

PMID: 35810327 PMC: 9562117. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioac139.


Chromosome Segregation in the Oocyte: What Goes Wrong during Aging.

Wasielak-Politowska M, Kordowitzki P Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(5).

PMID: 35270022 PMC: 8911062. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052880.