» Articles » PMID: 17892559

Three Dimensional Evaluation of Posture in Standing with the PosturePrint: an Intra- and Inter-examiner Reliability Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2007 Sep 26
PMID 17892559
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few digitizers can measure the complexity of upright human postural displacements in six degrees of freedom of the head, rib cage, and pelvis.

Methods: In a University laboratory, three examiners performed delayed repeated postural measurements on forty subjects over two days. Three digital photographs (left lateral, AP, right lateral) of each of 40 volunteer participants were obtained, twice, by three examiners. Examiners placed 13 markers on the subjects before photography and chose 16 points on the photographic images. Using the PosturePrint internet computer system, head, rib cage, and pelvic postures were calculated as rotations (Rx, Ry, Rz) in degrees and translations (Tx, Tz) in millimeters. For reliability, two different types (liberal = ICC(3,1) & conservative = ICC(2,1)) of inter- and intra-examiner correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Standard error of measurements (SEM) and mean absolute differences within and between observers' measurements were also determined.

Results: All of the "liberal" ICCs were in the excellent range (> 0.84). For the more "conservative" type ICCs, four Inter-examiner ICCs were in the interval (0.5-0.6), 10 ICCs were in the interval (0.61-0.74), and the remainder were greater than 0.75. SEMs were 2.7 degrees or less for all rotations and 5.9 mm or less for all translations. Mean absolute differences within examiners and between examiners were 3.5 degrees or less for all rotations and 8.4 mm or less for all translations.

Conclusion: For the PosturePrint system, the combined inter-examiner and intra-examiner correlation coefficients were in the good (14/44) and excellent (30/44) ranges. SEMs and mean absolute differences within and between examiners' measurements were small. Thus, this posture digitizer is reliable for clinical use.

Citing Articles

Relationship between the bilateral ratios of the thoracic shape and electromyographic activity of the thoracic and lumbar iliocostalis muscles during thoracic lateral translation.

Hirosawa A, Kakizaki F, Komuro N, Homma Y, Omotehara T, Kawata S J Phys Ther Sci. 2023; 35(3):185-192.

PMID: 36866015 PMC: 9974312. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.35.185.


Randomized Feasibility Pilot Trial of Adding a New Three-Dimensional Adjustable Posture-Corrective Orthotic to a Multi-Modal Program for the Treatment of Nonspecific Neck Pain.

Youssef A, Moustafa I, El Melhat A, Huang X, Oakley P, Harrison D J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498603 PMC: 9737469. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237028.


Addition of a new three-dimensional adjustable cervical thoracic orthosis to a multi-modal program in the treatment of nonspecific neck pain: study protocol for a randomised pilot trial.

Youssef A, Xia N, Emara S, Moustafa I, Huang X Trials. 2019; 20(1):248.

PMID: 31036033 PMC: 6489278. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3337-0.


Two-dimensional digital photography for child body posture evaluation: standardized technique, reliable parameters and normative data for age 7-10 years.

Stolinski L, Kozinoga M, Czaprowski D, Tyrakowski M, Cerny P, Suzuki N Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017; 12:38.

PMID: 29276784 PMC: 5738151. DOI: 10.1186/s13013-017-0146-7.


Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation.

Triano J, Budgell B, Bagnulo A, Roffey B, Bergmann T, Cooperstein R Chiropr Man Therap. 2014; 21(1):36.

PMID: 24499598 PMC: 4028787. DOI: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-36.


References
1.
Raine S, Twomey L . Head and shoulder posture variations in 160 asymptomatic women and men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78(11):1215-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90335-x. View

2.
Harrison D, Harrison D, Colloca C, Betz J, Janik T, Holland B . Repeatability over time of posture, radiograph positioning, and radiograph line drawing: an analysis of six control groups. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003; 26(2):87-98. DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2003.15. View

3.
Braun B, Amundson L . Quantitative assessment of head and shoulder posture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70(4):322-9. View

4.
Eliasziw M, Young S, Woodbury M . Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther. 1994; 74(8):777-88. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/74.8.777. View

5.
Dunk N, Lalonde J, Callaghan J . Implications for the use of postural analysis as a clinical diagnostic tool: reliability of quantifying upright standing spinal postures from photographic images. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005; 28(6):386-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.006. View