» Articles » PMID: 17785564

Detection of TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Transcripts and Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 in Urinary Sediments May Improve Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2007 Sep 6
PMID 17785564
Citations 126
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Early detection of prostate cancer can increase the curative success rate for prostate cancer. We studied the diagnostic usefulness of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts as well as the combination of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) RNA and TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts in urinary sediments after digital rectal examination (DRE).

Experimental Design: A total of 78 men with prostate cancer-positive biopsies and 30 men with prostate cancer-negative biopsies were included in this study. After DRE, the first voided urine was collected, and urinary sediments were obtained. We used semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis followed by Southern blot hybridization with a radiolabeled probe for the detection TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts in these urinary sediments. A quantitative RT-PCR assay for PCA3 was used to determine the PCA3 score in the same sediments.

Results: TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts can be detected in the urine after DRE with a sensitivity of 37%. In this cohort of patients, the PCA3-based assay had a sensitivity of 62%. When both markers were combined, the sensitivity increased to 73%. Especially in the cohort of men with persistently elevated serum prostate-specific antigen levels and history of negative biopsies, the high positive predictive value of 94% of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts could give a better indication which patients require repeat biopsies.

Conclusion: In this report, we used for the first time the combination of the prostate cancer-specific biomarkers TMPRSS2-ERG and PCA3, which significantly improves the sensitivity for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Nurturing the marriages of urinary liquid biopsies and nano-diagnostics for precision urinalysis of prostate cancer.

Liao C, Wu Z, Lin C, Chen X, Zou Y, Zhao W Smart Med. 2024; 2(1):e20220020.

PMID: 39188554 PMC: 11236013. DOI: 10.1002/SMMD.20220020.


Advances in sequencing and omics studies in prostate cancer: unveiling molecular pathogenesis and clinical applications.

Lu B, Liu Y, Yao Y, Yang T, Zhang H, Yang X Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1355551.

PMID: 38800374 PMC: 11116611. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1355551.


Unravelling the Role of P300 and TMPRSS2 in Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review.

Gioukaki C, Georgiou A, Gkaralea L, Kroupis C, Lazaris A, Alamanis C Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(14).

PMID: 37511059 PMC: 10379122. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411299.


Gene-Transcript Expression in Urine Supernatant and Urine Cell-Sediment Are Different but Equally Useful for Detecting Prostate Cancer.

Yazbek Hanna M, Winterbone M, OConnell S, Olivan M, Hurst R, Mills R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765747 PMC: 9913640. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030789.


Prospective evaluation of the role of imaging techniques and TMPRSS2:ERG mutation for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Lazzeri M, Fasulo V, Lughezzani G, Benetti A, Solda G, Asselta R Front Oncol. 2022; 12:968384.

PMID: 36147926 PMC: 9487838. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.968384.