» Articles » PMID: 17761592

Use of a Continuous-flow Device in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Sep 1
PMID 17761592
Citations 366
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The use of left ventricular assist devices is an accepted therapy for patients with refractory heart failure, but current pulsatile volume-displacement devices have limitations (including large pump size and limited long-term mechanical durability) that have reduced widespread adoption of this technology. Continuous-flow pumps are newer types of left ventricular assist devices developed to overcome some of these limitations.

Methods: In a prospective, multicenter study without a concurrent control group, 133 patients with end-stage heart failure who were on a waiting list for heart transplantation underwent implantation of a continuous-flow pump. The principal outcomes were the proportions of patients who, at 180 days, had undergone transplantation, had cardiac recovery, or had ongoing mechanical support while remaining eligible for transplantation. We also assessed functional status and quality of life.

Results: The principal outcomes occurred in 100 patients (75%). The median duration of support was 126 days (range, 1 to 600). The survival rate during support was 75% at 6 months and 68% at 12 months. At 3 months, therapy was associated with significant improvement in functional status (according to the New York Heart Association class and results of a 6-minute walk test) and in quality of life (according to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaires). Major adverse events included postoperative bleeding, stroke, right heart failure, and percutaneous lead infection. Pump thrombosis occurred in two patients.

Conclusions: A continuous-flow left ventricular assist device can provide effective hemodynamic support for a period of at least 6 months in patients awaiting heart transplantation, with improved functional status and quality of life. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121472 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Khoufi E Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39859993 PMC: 11767145. DOI: 10.3390/life15010053.


Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in Heart Failure Patients with Previous Mechanical Cardiocirculatory Support.

DAlonzo M, Terzi A, Baudo M, Ronzoni M, Uricchio N, Muneretto C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797356 PMC: 11721583. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010275.


Living biodrugs and how tissue source influences mesenchymal stem cell therapeutics for heart failure.

Shah S, Nawaz H, Qazi M, Jain H, Lucke-Wold B World J Cardiol. 2024; 16(11):619-625.

PMID: 39600993 PMC: 11586726. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i11.619.


Trends and predictors of functional class after high-risk left ventricular assist device implantation at a destination therapy center.

Eisenga J, McCullough K, Afzal A, DiMaio J, Moubarak G, Milligan G J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(9):6037-6044.

PMID: 39444858 PMC: 11494542. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-514.


Outcomes after SynCardia® temporary total artificial heart implantation: A 20-year single-center experience in 196 patients.

Razumov A, Burri M, Zittermann A, Radakovic D, Lauenroth V, Rojas S Artif Organs. 2024; 49(2):266-275.

PMID: 39283166 PMC: 11752975. DOI: 10.1111/aor.14860.