» Articles » PMID: 17709634

In Vivo Characterization of Murine Myocardial Perfusion with Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Validation and Application in Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 Deficient Mice

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2007 Aug 22
PMID 17709634
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ability to noninvasively evaluate murine myocardial blood flow (MBF) in vivo would provide an important tool for cardiovascular research. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) has been used to measure MBF; however, it has not been validated in mice. This study assesses whether MCE can evaluate MBF at rest and after vasodilation and measure the maximal augmentation (coronary reserve) of MBF in mice. Wild-type (WT) and nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3)-deficient (NOS3-/-) mice were studied.

Methods And Results: MCE was performed at baseline and after intravenous infusion of acetylcholine or adenosine. Definity contrast agent was infused, and parasternal views were acquired in real-time mode. Replenishment curves of myocardial contrast were obtained, and rates of signal rise (beta) and plateau intensity (A) were calculated. MBF estimated by the product of A and beta (Abeta) was compared with that measured with fluorescent microspheres. MCE analysis was feasible in 98% (52/53) of mice. MBF measured by microspheres increased with adenosine and correlated closely with Abeta. There was no difference in MCE-derived MBF between WT and NOS3-/- mice at rest. Adenosine infusion increased MBF by 3.0+/-0.6-fold in NOS3-/- mice and 2.5+/-0.3-fold in WT (P=0.58 between genotypes). Acetylcholine induced an increase of 2.4+/-0.2-fold in MBF in WT mice but did not increase MBF in NOS3-/- mice (P<0.0005 versus WT).

Conclusions: MBF, coronary reserve, and vasodilator responses can be evaluated accurately in the intact mouse by MCE. This method demonstrated a preserved coronary response to adenosine but an impaired acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in NOS3-/- mice compared with WT mice.

Citing Articles

Biomedical Imaging in Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Disease.

Sosnovik D, Scherrer-Crosbie M Circ Res. 2022; 130(12):1851-1868.

PMID: 35679370 PMC: 9202007. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320306.


Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods.

Thielen N, Kleinsasser A, Freeling J PeerJ. 2021; 9:e11500.

PMID: 34141476 PMC: 8176928. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11500.


Myocardial Blood Flow Control by Oxygen Sensing Vascular Kvβ Proteins.

Ohanyan V, Raph S, Dwenger M, Hu X, Pucci T, Mack G Circ Res. 2021; 128(6):738-751.

PMID: 33499656 PMC: 8486354. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317715.


Flow Augmentation in the Myocardium by Ultrasound Cavitation of Microbubbles: Role of Shear-Mediated Purinergic Signaling.

Moccetti F, Belcik T, Latifi Y, Xie A, Ozawa K, Brown E J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020; 33(8):1023-1031.e2.

PMID: 32532642 PMC: 7416478. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.016.


Guidelines for measuring cardiac physiology in mice.

Lindsey M, Kassiri Z, Virag J, de Castro Bras L, Scherrer-Crosbie M Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018; 314(4):H733-H752.

PMID: 29351456 PMC: 5966769. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00339.2017.