Changes in Microbial Community Composition and Geochemistry During Uranium and Technetium Bioimmobilization
Overview
Microbiology
Authors
Affiliations
In a previous column study, we investigated the long-term impact of ethanol additions on U and Tc mobility in groundwater (M. M. Michalsen et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:7048-7053, 2006). Ethanol additions stimulated iron- and sulfate-reducing conditions and significantly enhanced U and Tc removal from groundwater compared to an identical column that received no ethanol additions (control). Here we present the results of a combined signature lipid and nucleic acid-based microbial community characterization in sediments collected from along the ethanol-stimulated and control column flow paths. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis showed both an increase in microbial biomass (approximately 2 orders of magnitude) and decreased ratios of cyclopropane to monoenoic precursor fatty acids in the stimulated column compared to the control, which is consistent with electron donor limitation in the control. Spatial shifts in microbial community composition were identified by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis as well as by quantitative PCR, which showed that Geobacteraceae increased significantly near the stimulated-column outlet, where soluble electron acceptors were largely depleted. Clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes from selected flow path locations in the stimulated column showed that Proteobacteria were dominant near the inlet (46 to 52%), while members of candidate division OP11 were dominant near the outlet (67%). Redundancy analysis revealed a highly significant difference (P = 0.0003) between microbial community compositions within stimulated and control sediments, with geochemical variables explaining 68% of the variance in community composition on the first two canonical axes.
Wilpiszeski R, Gionfriddo C, Wymore A, Moon J, Lowe K, Podar M PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0232437.
PMID: 32986713 PMC: 7521895. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232437.
U(VI) reduction in sulfate-reducing subsurface sediments amended with ethanol or acetate.
Converse B, Wu T, Findlay R, Roden E Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79(13):4173-7.
PMID: 23624470 PMC: 3697582. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00420-13.
Mondani L, Benzerara K, Carriere M, Christen R, Mamindy-Pajany Y, Fevrier L PLoS One. 2011; 6(10):e25771.
PMID: 21998695 PMC: 3187815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025771.
Youssef N, Blainey P, Quake S, Elshahed M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(21):7804-14.
PMID: 21908640 PMC: 3209139. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06059-11.
How sulphate-reducing microorganisms cope with stress: lessons from systems biology.
Zhou J, He Q, Hemme C, Mukhopadhyay A, Hillesland K, Zhou A Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011; 9(6):452-66.
PMID: 21572460 DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2575.