» Articles » PMID: 16204552

Microbiological and Geochemical Heterogeneity in an in Situ Uranium Bioremediation Field Site

Overview
Date 2005 Oct 6
PMID 16204552
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The geochemistry and microbiology of a uranium-contaminated subsurface environment that had undergone two seasons of acetate addition to stimulate microbial U(VI) reduction was examined. There were distinct horizontal and vertical geochemical gradients that could be attributed in large part to the manner in which acetate was distributed in the aquifer, with more reduction of Fe(III) and sulfate occurring at greater depths and closer to the point of acetate injection. Clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes derived from sediments and groundwater indicated an enrichment of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the order Desulfobacterales in sediment and groundwater samples. These samples were collected nearest the injection gallery where microbially reducible Fe(III) oxides were highly depleted, groundwater sulfate concentrations were low, and increases in acid volatile sulfide were observed in the sediment. Further down-gradient, metal-reducing conditions were present as indicated by intermediate Fe(II)/Fe(total) ratios, lower acid volatile sulfide values, and increased abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences belonging to the dissimilatory Fe(III)- and U(VI)-reducing family Geobacteraceae. Maximal Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction correlated with maximal recovery of Geobacteraceae 16S rRNA gene sequences in both groundwater and sediment; however, the sites at which these maxima occurred were spatially separated within the aquifer. The substantial microbial and geochemical heterogeneity at this site demonstrates that attempts should be made to deliver acetate in a more uniform manner and that closely spaced sampling intervals, horizontally and vertically, in both sediment and groundwater are necessary in order to obtain a more in-depth understanding of microbial processes and the relative contribution of attached and planktonic populations to in situ uranium bioremediation.

Citing Articles

Risk of colloidal and pseudo-colloidal transport of actinides in nitrate contaminated groundwater near a radioactive waste repository after bioremediation.

Safonov A, Lavrinovich E, Emelyanov A, Boldyrev K, Kuryakov V, Rodygina N Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4557.

PMID: 35296759 PMC: 8927300. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08593-3.


Microbial interaction with and tolerance of radionuclides: underlying mechanisms and biotechnological applications.

Lopez-Fernandez M, Jroundi F, Ruiz-Fresneda M, Merroun M Microb Biotechnol. 2021; 14(3):810-828.

PMID: 33615734 PMC: 8085914. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13718.


On Modeling Ensemble Transport of Metal Reducing Motile Bacteria.

Yang X, Parashar R, Sund N, Plymale A, Scheibe T, Hu D Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):14638.

PMID: 31601954 PMC: 6787022. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51271-0.


Microbial Community and Bioremediation of Groundwater by Nitrate Removal in the Zone of a Radioactive Waste Surface Repository.

Safonov A, Babich T, Sokolova D, Grouzdev D, Tourova T, Poltaraus A Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1985.

PMID: 30190715 PMC: 6115527. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01985.


Potential for Methanosarcina to Contribute to Uranium Reduction during Acetate-Promoted Groundwater Bioremediation.

Holmes D, Orelana R, Giloteaux L, Wang L, Shrestha P, Williams K Microb Ecol. 2018; 76(3):660-667.

PMID: 29500492 PMC: 6132540. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-018-1165-5.


References
1.
Peacock A, Chang Y, Istok J, Krumholz L, Geyer R, Kinsall B . Utilization of microbial biofilms as monitors of bioremediation. Microb Ecol. 2004; 47(3):284-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-003-1024-9. View

2.
Dunbar J, Barns S, Ticknor L, Kuske C . Empirical and theoretical bacterial diversity in four Arizona soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(6):3035-45. PMC: 123964. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3035-3045.2002. View

3.
Eden P, Schmidt T, Blakemore R, Pace N . Phylogenetic analysis of Aquaspirillum magnetotacticum using polymerase chain reaction-amplified 16S rRNA-specific DNA. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991; 41(2):324-5. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-41-2-324. View

4.
Lovley D, Phillips E . Novel processes for anaerobic sulfate production from elemental sulfur by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994; 60(7):2394-9. PMC: 201662. DOI: 10.1128/aem.60.7.2394-2399.1994. View

5.
Senko J, Istok J, Suflita J, Krumholz L . In-situ evidence for uranium immobilization and remobilization. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(7):1491-6. DOI: 10.1021/es011240x. View