» Articles » PMID: 17619223

Surviving Surrogate Decision-making: What Helps and Hampers the Experience of Making Medical Decisions for Others

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2007 Jul 10
PMID 17619223
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A majority of end-of-life medical decisions are made by surrogate decision-makers who have varying degrees of preparation and comfort with their role. Having a seriously ill family member is stressful for surrogates. Moreover, most clinicians have had little training in working effectively with surrogates.

Objectives: To better understand the challenges of decision-making from the surrogate's perspective.

Design: Semistructured telephone interview study of the experience of surrogate decision-making.

Participants: Fifty designated surrogates with previous decision-making experience.

Approach: We asked surrogates to describe and reflect on their experience of making medical decisions for others. After coding transcripts, we conducted a content analysis to identify and categorize factors that made decision-making more or less difficult for surrogates.

Results: Surrogates identified four types of factors: (1) surrogate characteristics and life circumstances (such as coping strategies and competing responsibilities), (2) surrogates' social networks (such as intrafamily discord about the "right" decision), (3) surrogate-patient relationships and communication (such as difficulties with honoring known preferences), and (4) surrogate-clinician communication and relationship (such as interacting with a single physician whom the surrogate recognizes as the clinical spokesperson vs. many clinicians).

Conclusions: These data provide insights into the challenges that surrogates encounter when making decisions for loved ones and indicate areas where clinicians could intervene to facilitate the process of surrogate decision-making. Clinicians may want to include surrogates in advance care planning prior to decision-making, identify and address surrogate stressors during decision-making, and designate one person to communicate information about the patient's condition, prognosis, and treatment options.

Citing Articles

What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review.

McMahan R, Hickman S, Sudore R J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(4):652-660.

PMID: 38169025 PMC: 10973287. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08579-5.


Public awareness of advance care planning and hospice palliative care: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Korea.

Kim B, Lee J, Choi Y BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):205.

PMID: 38151721 PMC: 10752019. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01333-y.


The Stresses of Surrogate Decision-Making: Contributing Factors and Clinicians' Role in Mitigation.

Mishkin A, Allen N, Cheung S, Faccini M, Flicker L, Shalev D Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023; 41(8):895-905.

PMID: 37704184 PMC: 10932874. DOI: 10.1177/10499091231198750.


What Counts as a Surrogate Decision?.

Levi B, Dimmock A, Van Scoy L, Smith T, Kunzler B, Foy A Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023; 41(2):125-132.

PMID: 36997165 PMC: 10751970. DOI: 10.1177/10499091231168976.


Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers.

Andersen S, Butler R, Chang C, Arnold R, Angus D, White D Crit Care. 2023; 27(1):61.

PMID: 36797793 PMC: 9933411. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w.


References
1.
Hiltunen E, Medich C, Chase S, Peterson L, Forrow L . Family decision making for end-of-life treatment: the SUPPORT nurse narratives. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Clin Ethics. 2000; 10(2):126-34. View

2.
Vig E, Taylor J, Starks H, Hopley E, Fryer-Edwards K . Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54(11):1688-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x. View

3.
ABBOTT K, Sago J, Breen C, Abernethy A, Tulsky J . Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(1):197-201. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00040. View

4.
Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J . Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84(1):48-51. PMC: 2363610. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573. View

5.
Ditto P, Danks J, Smucker W, Bookwala J, Coppola K, Dresser R . Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161(3):421-30. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.421. View