» Articles » PMID: 38169025

What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 3
PMID 38169025
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized as crucial by patients, families, and clinicians; however, different definitions and measurements have led to inconsistencies in practice and mixed evidence in the literature. This narrative review explores ACP's evolution, innovations, and outcomes using thematic analysis to synthesize data from randomized controlled trials, reviews, and editorials. Key findings include (1) ACP has evolved over the past several decades from a sole focus on code status and advance directive (AD) forms to a continuum of care planning over the life course focused on tailored preparation for patients and surrogate decision-makers and (2) ACP measurement has evolved from traditional outcome metrics, such as AD completion, to a comprehensive outcomes framework that includes behavior change theory, systems, implementation science, and a focus on surrogate outcomes. Since the recent development of an ACP consensus definition and outcomes framework, high-quality trials have reported mainly positive outcomes for interventions, especially for surrogates, which aligns with the patient desire to relieve decision-making burden for loved ones. Additionally, measurement of "clinically meaningful" ACP information, including documented goals of care discussions, is increasingly being integrated into electronic health records (EHR), and emerging, real-time assessments and natural language processing are enhancing ACP evaluation. To make things easier for patients, families, and care teams, clinicians and researchers can use and disseminate these evolved definitions; provide patients validated, easy-to-use tools that prime patients for conversations and decrease health disparities; use easy-to-access clinician training and simple scripts for interdisciplinary team members; and document patients' values and preferences in the medical record to capture clinically meaningful ACP so this information is available at the point of care. Future efforts should focus on efficient implementation, expanded reimbursement options, and seamless integration of EHR documentation to ensure ACP's continued evolution to better serve patients and their care partners.

Citing Articles

Exploring perceived barriers to palliative and end of life care provision in South-West England: bringing together the perspectives of professionals, patients, and families.

Hodge G, Kallis G, Oh T, Wheat H, Pearce S Front Sociol. 2025; 9:1488688.

PMID: 39902145 PMC: 11788847. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1488688.


Why Mental Health Clinicians are Not Engaging in Advance Care Planning with Older People with Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Illnesses.

Wand A, Karageorge A, Zeng Y, Browne R, Sands M, Kanareck D Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:4195-4206.

PMID: 39679317 PMC: 11646467. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S496651.


Advance care planning in adults ages 80 years and older with impaired cognition: Using actual conversations to examine best practices.

Saylor M, Hanna V, Zhang P, Thai G, Green C, Cagle J Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 21(1):e14331.

PMID: 39655567 PMC: 11772722. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14331.


Advance Care Planning, End-of-Life Preferences, and Burdensome Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Wolff J, Scerpella D, Giovannetti E, Roth D, Hanna V, Hussain N JAMA Intern Med. 2024; 185(2):162-170.

PMID: 39621341 PMC: 11612918. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6215.


Advance care planning in patients with respiratory failure.

Ribeiro C, Pamplona P, Simonds A Eur Respir Rev. 2024; 33(174).

PMID: 39537243 PMC: 11558536. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0120-2024.


References
1.
Nouri S, Li L, Huang C, Chung A, Chen Stokes S, Pan S . "At the End I Have a Say": Engaging the Chinese Community in Advance Care Planning. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023; 66(5):551-560.e1. PMC: 10593504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.07.017. View

2.
Jimenez G, Tan W, Virk A, Low C, Car J, Ho A . Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 56(3):436-459.e25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016. View

3.
McMahan R, Knight S, Fried T, Sudore R . Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012; 46(3):355-65. PMC: 4111444. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.006. View

4.
Sudore R, Lum H, You J, Hanson L, Meier D, Pantilat S . Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 53(5):821-832.e1. PMC: 5728651. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. View

5.
Unroe K, Hickman S, Torke A . Care Consistency With Documented Care Preferences: Methodologic Considerations for Implementing the "Measuring What Matters" Quality Indicator. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016; 52(4):453-458. PMC: 5586497. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.015. View