Reliability and Validity of a Nutrition and Physical Activity Environmental Self-assessment for Child Care
Overview
Orthopedics
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Few assessment instruments have examined the nutrition and physical activity environments in child care, and none are self-administered. Given the emerging focus on child care settings as a target for intervention, a valid and reliable measure of the nutrition and physical activity environment is needed.
Methods: To measure inter-rater reliability, 59 child care center directors and 109 staff completed the self-assessment concurrently, but independently. Three weeks later, a repeat self-assessment was completed by a sub-sample of 38 directors to assess test-retest reliability. To assess criterion validity, a researcher-administered environmental assessment was conducted at 69 centers and was compared to a self-assessment completed by the director. A weighted kappa test statistic and percent agreement were calculated to assess agreement for each question on the self-assessment.
Results: For inter-rater reliability, kappa statistics ranged from 0.20 to 1.00 across all questions. Test-retest reliability of the self-assessment yielded kappa statistics that ranged from 0.07 to 1.00. The inter-quartile kappa statistic ranges for inter-rater and test-retest reliability were 0.45 to 0.63 and 0.27 to 0.45, respectively. When percent agreement was calculated, questions ranged from 52.6% to 100% for inter-rater reliability and 34.3% to 100% for test-retest reliability. Kappa statistics for validity ranged from -0.01 to 0.79, with an inter-quartile range of 0.08 to 0.34. Percent agreement for validity ranged from 12.9% to 93.7%.
Conclusion: This study provides estimates of criterion validity, inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability for an environmental nutrition and physical activity self-assessment instrument for child care. Results indicate that the self-assessment is a stable and reasonably accurate instrument for use with child care interventions. We therefore recommend the Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) instrument to researchers and practitioners interested in conducting healthy weight intervention in child care. However, a more robust, less subjective measure would be more appropriate for researchers seeking an outcome measure to assess intervention impact.
Hayek J, Dickson K, Lafave L JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025; 8:e68372.
PMID: 39841984 PMC: 11809617. DOI: 10.2196/68372.
Bucko A, McIver K, Zaltz D, Liu T, Neelon B, Benjamin-Neelon S Child Care Health Dev. 2024; 51(1):e70004.
PMID: 39629859 PMC: 11623443. DOI: 10.1111/cch.70004.
Kracht C, Staiano A, Harris M, Domangue K, Grantham-Caston M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309113.
PMID: 39302934 PMC: 11414991. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309113.
Webster E, Kepper M, Saha S, Beyl R, Kracht C, Romain J BMC Pediatr. 2023; 23(1):455.
PMID: 37689622 PMC: 10492343. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04260-2.
Effect of Applying Best Practices for Physical Activity and Screen Time to Family Childcare Homes.
Jiang Q, Risica P, Tovar A, Cooksey Stowers K, Schwartz M, Lombardi C Prev Chronic Dis. 2023; 20:E60.
PMID: 37441753 PMC: 10364836. DOI: 10.5888/pcd20.220325.