» Articles » PMID: 17599350

Predicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site

Overview
Journal J Mol Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Jun 30
PMID 17599350
Citations 139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A central challenge in structure-based ligand design is the accurate prediction of binding free energies. Here we apply alchemical free energy calculations in explicit solvent to predict ligand binding in a model cavity in T4 lysozyme. Even in this simple site, there are challenges. We made systematic improvements, beginning with single poses from docking, then including multiple poses, additional protein conformational changes, and using an improved charge model. Computed absolute binding free energies had an RMS error of 1.9 kcal/mol relative to previously determined experimental values. In blind prospective tests, the methods correctly discriminated between several true ligands and decoys in a set of putative binders identified by docking. In these prospective tests, the RMS error in predicted binding free energies relative to those subsequently determined experimentally was only 0.6 kcal/mol. X-ray crystal structures of the new ligands bound in the cavity corresponded closely to predictions from the free energy calculations, but sometimes differed from those predicted by docking. Finally, we examined the impact of holding the protein rigid, as in docking, with a view to learning how approximations made in docking affect accuracy and how they may be improved.

Citing Articles

Anthocyanin-Binding Affinity and Non-Covalent Interactions with IIS-Pathway-Related Protein Through Molecular Docking.

Haroon , Khan Z, Javaid W, Xing L Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025; 47(2).

PMID: 39996808 PMC: 11854422. DOI: 10.3390/cimb47020087.


Impact of Varying Velocities and Solvation Boxes on Alchemical Free-Energy Simulations.

Wang M, Jiang H, Ryde U J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(4):2107-2115.

PMID: 39887323 PMC: 11863368. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02236.


ANN-QSAR, Molecular Docking, ADMET Predictions, and Molecular Dynamics Studies of Isothiazole Derivatives to Design New and Selective Inhibitors of HCV Polymerase NS5B.

Fattouche M, Belaidi S, Abchir O, Al-Shaar W, Younes K, Al-Mogren M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 17(12.

PMID: 39770554 PMC: 11678770. DOI: 10.3390/ph17121712.


Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Ensemble Methods for Accurate, Precise and Reproducible Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Bhati A, Wan S, Coveney P J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 21(1):440-462.

PMID: 39680850 PMC: 11736689. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01389.


Kinetics-Based State Definitions for Discrete Binding Conformations of T4 L99A in MD via Markov State Modeling.

Zhang C, Osato M, Mobley D J Chem Inf Model. 2024; 64(23):8870-8879.

PMID: 39589162 PMC: 11812578. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01364.


References
1.
Shoichet B, Leach A, Kuntz I . Ligand solvation in molecular docking. Proteins. 1999; 34(1):4-16. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<4::aid-prot2>3.0.co;2-6. View

2.
Mann G, Hermans J . Modeling protein-small molecule interactions: structure and thermodynamics of noble gases binding in a cavity in mutant phage T4 lysozyme L99A. J Mol Biol. 2000; 302(4):979-89. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4064. View

3.
Kuhn B, Kollman P . Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. J Med Chem. 2000; 43(20):3786-91. DOI: 10.1021/jm000241h. View

4.
Kollman P, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L . Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res. 2000; 33(12):889-97. DOI: 10.1021/ar000033j. View

5.
Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R . Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins. 2002; 47(4):409-43. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10115. View