» Articles » PMID: 1752426

The Selection-mutation-drift Theory of Synonymous Codon Usage

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1991 Nov 1
PMID 1752426
Citations 474
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is argued that the bias in synonymous codon usage observed in unicellular organisms is due to a balance between the forces of selection and mutation in a finite population, with greater bias in highly expressed genes reflecting stronger selection for efficiency of translation. A population genetic model is developed taking into account population size and selective differences between synonymous codons. A biochemical model is then developed to predict the magnitude of selective differences between synonymous codons in unicellular organisms in which growth rate (or possibly growth yield) can be equated with fitness. Selection can arise from differences in either the speed or the accuracy of translation. A model for the effect of speed of translation on fitness is considered in detail, a similar model for accuracy more briefly. The model is successful in predicting a difference in the degree of bias at the beginning than in the rest of the gene under some circumstances, as observed in Escherichia coli, but grossly overestimates the amount of bias expected. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

Citing Articles

Interpreting mammalian synonymous site conservation in light of the unwanted transcript hypothesis.

Christmas M, Dong M, Meadows J, Kozyrev S, Lindblad-Toh K Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2007.

PMID: 40011430 PMC: 11865589. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57179-w.


A study on the codon usage bias of arenavirus common genes.

Thomas P, Ferrer M, Lozano M, Gomez R Front Microbiol. 2025; 15:1490076.

PMID: 39917269 PMC: 11799557. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1490076.


Correlations of gene expression, codon usage bias, and evolutionary rates of the mitochondrial genome show tissue differentiation in Ophioglossum vulgatum.

Hao J, Liang Y, Wang T, Su Y BMC Plant Biol. 2025; 25(1):134.

PMID: 39893444 PMC: 11786343. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06157-x.


Phylogeny and divergence time estimation of the subfamily Amphipsyllinae based on the mitogenome.

Pu J, Lin X, Dong W Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1494204.

PMID: 39723187 PMC: 11668791. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1494204.


Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Nannostomus eques and comparative analysis with Nannostomus beckfordi.

Li X, Sun C, Zhan Y, Jia S, Lu C Mol Genet Genomics. 2024; 300(1):3.

PMID: 39704846 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-024-02212-8.


References
1.
Bulmer M . Codon usage and intragenic position. J Theor Biol. 1988; 133(1):67-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80024-9. View

2.
Gold L . Posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988; 57:199-233. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.001215. View

3.
Sorensen M, Kurland C, Pedersen S . Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1989; 207(2):365-77. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90260-x. View

4.
Bilgin N, Ehrenberg M, Kurland C . Is translation inhibited by noncognate ternary complexes?. FEBS Lett. 1988; 233(1):95-9. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81362-0. View

5.
Liljenstrom H, von Heijne G . Translation rate modification by preferential codon usage: intragenic position effects. J Theor Biol. 1987; 124(1):43-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80251-5. View