» Articles » PMID: 17519021

Coordinated Regulation of Myc Trans-activation Targets by Polycomb and the Trithorax Group Protein Ash1

Overview
Journal BMC Mol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2007 May 24
PMID 17519021
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Myc oncoprotein is a transcriptional regulator whose function is essential for normal development. Myc is capable of binding to 10% of the mammalian genome, and it is unclear how a developing embryo controls the DNA binding of its abundant Myc proteins in order to avoid Myc's potential for inducing tumorigenesis.

Results: To identify chromatin binding proteins with a potential role in controlling Myc activity, we established a genetic assay for dMyc activity in Drosophila. We conducted a genome-wide screen using this assay, and identified the Trithorax Group protein Ash1 as a modifier of dMyc activity. Ash1 is a histone methyltransferase known for its role in opposing repression by Polycomb. Using RNAi in the embryo and Affymetrix microarrays, we show that ash1 RNAi causes the increased expression of many genes, suggesting that it is directly or indirectly required for repression in the embryo, in contrast to its known role in maintenance of activation. Many of these genes also respond similarly upon depletion of Pc and pho transcripts, as determined by concurrent microarray analysis of Pc and pho RNAi embryos, suggesting that the three are required for low levels of expression of a common set of targets. Further, many of these overlapping targets are also activated by Myc overexpression. We identify a second group of genes whose expression in the embryo requires Ash1, consistent with its previously established role in maintenance of activation. We find that this second group of Ash1 targets overlaps those activated by Myc and that ectopic Myc overcomes their requirement for Ash1.

Conclusion: Genetic, genomic and chromatin immunoprecipitation data suggest a model in which Pc, Ash1 and Pho are required to maintain a low level of expression of embryonic targets of activation by Myc, and that this occurs, directly or indirectly, by a combination of disparate chromatin modifications.

Citing Articles

ortholog of the Muller D element .

Mo M, Sabb D, LoBello L, Chambers K, Kershaw K, Welles C MicroPubl Biol. 2024; 2024.

PMID: 39650081 PMC: 11624501. DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001322.


Myc function in Drosophila.

Gallant P Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013; 3(10):a014324.

PMID: 24086064 PMC: 3784813. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a014324.


MicroRNA miR-308 regulates dMyc through a negative feedback loop in Drosophila.

Daneshvar K, Nath S, Khan A, Shover W, Richardson C, Goodliffe J Biol Open. 2013; 2(1):1-9.

PMID: 23336071 PMC: 3545263. DOI: 10.1242/bio.20122725.


Trithorax group proteins: switching genes on and keeping them active.

Schuettengruber B, Martinez A, Iovino N, Cavalli G Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011; 12(12):799-814.

PMID: 22108599 DOI: 10.1038/nrm3230.


Myc localizes to histone locus bodies during replication in Drosophila.

Daneshvar K, Khan A, Goodliffe J PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e23928.

PMID: 21886841 PMC: 3160328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023928.


References
1.
Muller J, Kassis J . Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006; 16(5):476-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.08.005. View

2.
Mao D, Barsyte-Lovejoy D, Ho C, Watson J, Stojanova A, Penn L . Promoter-binding and repression of PDGFRB by c-Myc are separable activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(11):3462-8. PMC: 443544. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh669. View

3.
Patel J, Loboda A, Showe M, Showe L, McMahon S . Analysis of genomic targets reveals complex functions of MYC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4(7):562-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1393. View

4.
Bellen H, Levis R, Liao G, He Y, Carlson J, Tsang G . The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics. 2004; 167(2):761-81. PMC: 1470905. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.026427. View

5.
Levine S, King I, Kingston R . Division of labor in polycomb group repression. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004; 29(9):478-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.07.007. View