» Articles » PMID: 17476493

Behavioral Analysis of Predictive Saccade Tracking As Studied by Countermanding

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 May 4
PMID 17476493
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to make predictive saccadic eye movements is dependent on neural signals that anticipate the onset of a visual target. We used a novel paradigm-based on the saccade-countermanding task-as a tool to investigate rhythm saccade pacing and to provide information on the mechanisms of predictive timing. In particular, we examined the ability of normal subjects to stop a sequence of periodically paced eye movements when cued by a stop signal that was presented at different times with respect to the last target of the sequence (stop signal delay, SSD). The timing of the stop signal affected the ability to stop the saccadic sequence (make a saccade to a central target rather than to the peripheral alternating targets) in different ways, depending on the preceding tracking behavior. For the same SSD, subjects cancelled fewer trials during predictive tracking (promoted by tracking targets alternating at a fast pacing rate, 1.0 Hz) than during reactive tracking (tracking alternating targets at a low pacing rate, 0.2 Hz). In addition, on non-canceled trials, there was an increase in the delay of the corrective saccade to the central target with increasing SSD for pacing at 0.2 Hz, but the timing of the corrective saccade remained near constant for 1.0 Hz pacing. In examining the timing between movements, we estimate that the repetitive GO process that drives the saccades during predictive tracking begins earlier and has a shorter duration than the repetitive GO process during reactive tracking. These behavioral results provide further insight into the initiation process of predictive responses. In particular, the reduced reaction time and the corresponding short duration of the predictive process may result from a faster accumulation of neuronal discharge to a relatively fixed threshold.

Citing Articles

Microsaccade production during saccade cancelation in a stop-signal task.

Godlove D, Schall J Vision Res. 2014; 118:5-16.

PMID: 25448116 PMC: 4422788. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.025.


No perisaccadic mislocalization with abruptly cancelled saccades.

Atsma J, Maij F, Corneil B, Medendorp W J Neurosci. 2014; 34(16):5497-504.

PMID: 24741040 PMC: 6608224. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4773-13.2014.


Measurement of the extraocular spike potential during saccade countermanding.

Godlove D, Garr A, Woodman G, Schall J J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(1):104-14.

PMID: 21490279 PMC: 3129738. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00896.2010.


A model of time estimation and error feedback in predictive timing behavior.

Joiner W, Shelhamer M J Comput Neurosci. 2008; 26(1):119-38.

PMID: 18563546 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-008-0102-x.

References
1.
Reddi B, Carpenter R . The influence of urgency on decision time. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(8):827-30. DOI: 10.1038/77739. View

2.
Hanes D, Carpenter R . Countermanding saccades in humans. Vision Res. 1999; 39(16):2777-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00011-5. View

3.
Kornylo K, Dill N, Saenz M, Krauzlis R . Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(6):2984-99. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00859.2002. View

4.
Corneil B, Elsley J . Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(1):883-95. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01171.2004. View

5.
Cabel D, Armstrong I, Reingold E, Munoz D . Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 133(4):431-41. DOI: 10.1007/s002210000440. View