» Articles » PMID: 17471746

Semantic and Phonetic Enhancements for Speech-in-noise Recognition by Native and Non-native Listeners

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2007 May 3
PMID 17471746
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has shown that speech recognition differences between native and proficient non-native listeners emerge under suboptimal conditions. Current evidence has suggested that the key deficit that underlies this disproportionate effect of unfavorable listening conditions for non-native listeners is their less effective use of compensatory information at higher levels of processing to recover from information loss at the phoneme identification level. The present study investigated whether this non-native disadvantage could be overcome if enhancements at various levels of processing were presented in combination. Native and non-native listeners were presented with English sentences in which the final word varied in predictability and which were produced in either plain or clear speech. Results showed that, relative to the low-predictability-plain-speech baseline condition, non-native listener final word recognition improved only when both semantic and acoustic enhancements were available (high-predictability-clear-speech). In contrast, the native listeners benefited from each source of enhancement separately and in combination. These results suggests that native and non-native listeners apply similar strategies for speech-in-noise perception: The crucial difference is in the signal clarity required for contextual information to be effective, rather than in an inability of non-native listeners to take advantage of this contextual information per se.

Citing Articles

Language Experience Influences Sociolinguistic Development: The Role of Speaker Race and Language Attitudes on Bilingual and Monolingual Adults' Accent Processing.

Ritsema V, Workye R, Weatherhead D Brain Sci. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452040 PMC: 11506646. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14101028.


Assessing the effects of "native speaker" status on classic findings in speech research.

Strand J, Brown V, Sewell K, Lin Y, Lefkowitz E, Saksena C J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 153(12):3027-3041.

PMID: 39298201 PMC: 11620953. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001640.


Audiovisual perception of interrupted speech by nonnative listeners.

Yang J, Nagaraj N, Magimairaj B Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(5):1763-1776.

PMID: 38886302 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02909-3.


Visual scanning patterns of a talking face when evaluating phonetic information in a native and non-native language.

Deng X, McClay E, Jastrzebski E, Wang Y, Yeung H PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0304150.

PMID: 38805447 PMC: 11132507. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304150.


The Involvement of Listening Effort in Explaining Bilingual Listening Under Adverse Listening Conditions.

Bsharat-Maalouf D, Degani T, Karawani H Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231205107.

PMID: 37941413 PMC: 10637154. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231205107.