» Articles » PMID: 35907167

Speaking with a KN95 Face Mask: a Within-subjects Study on Speaker Adaptation and Strategies to Improve Intelligibility

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Jul 30
PMID 35907167
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a growing interest in the functional impact of masks on speech and communication. Prior work has shown that masks dampen sound, impede visual communication cues, and reduce intelligibility. However, more work is needed to understand how speakers change their speech while wearing a mask and to identify strategies to overcome the impact of wearing a mask. Data were collected from 19 healthy adults during a single in-person session. We investigated the effects of wearing a KN95 mask on speech intelligibility, as judged by two speech-language pathologists, examined speech kinematics and acoustics associated with mask-wearing, and explored KN95 acoustic filtering. We then considered the efficacy of three speaking strategies to improve speech intelligibility: Loud, Clear, and Slow speech. To inform speaker strategy recommendations, we related findings to self-reported speaker effort. Results indicated that healthy speakers could compensate for the presence of a mask and achieve normal speech intelligibility. Additionally, we showed that speaking loudly or clearly-and, to a lesser extent, slowly-improved speech intelligibility. However, using these strategies may require increased physical and cognitive effort and should be used only when necessary. These results can inform recommendations for speakers wearing masks, particularly those with communication disorders (e.g., dysarthria) who may struggle to adapt to a mask but can respond to explicit instructions. Such recommendations may further help non-native speakers and those communicating in a noisy environment or with listeners with hearing loss.

Citing Articles

The impact of face coverings on audio-visual contributions to communication with conversational speech.

Jackson I, Perugia E, Stone M, Saunders G Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):25.

PMID: 38652383 PMC: 11039583. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00552-y.


Feedback From Automatic Speech Recognition to Elicit Clear Speech in Healthy Speakers.

Gutz S, Maffei M, Green J Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023; 32(6):2940-2959.

PMID: 37824377 PMC: 10721250. DOI: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00030.


The effects of face mask on speech production and its implication for forensic speaker identification-A cross-linguistic study.

Geng P, Lu Q, Guo H, Zeng J PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0283724.

PMID: 36996037 PMC: 10062611. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283724.

References
1.
Hustad K, Cahill M . Effects of presentation mode and repeated familiarization on intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003; 12(2):198-208. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/066). View

2.
Tjaden K, Lam J, Wilding G . Vowel acoustics in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: comparison of clear, loud, and slow speaking conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013; 56(5):1485-502. PMC: 5572218. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0259). View

3.
Saunders G, Jackson I, Visram A . Impacts of face coverings on communication: an indirect impact of COVID-19. Int J Audiol. 2020; 60(7):495-506. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1851401. View

4.
Fisher K, Barile J, Guerin R, Vanden Esschert K, Jeffers A, Tian L . Factors Associated with Cloth Face Covering Use Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, April and May 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(28):933-937. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6928e3. View

5.
Fraser S, Gagne J, Alepins M, DuBois P . Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009; 53(1):18-33. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0140). View