Antinociceptive Action of Myricitrin: Involvement of the K+ and Ca2+ Channels
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms involved in the antinociception afforded by myricitrin in chemical models of nociception in mice. Myricitrin given by intrathecal (i.t.) or intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route produced dose-related antinociception when evaluated against acetic acid-induced visceral pain in mice. In addition, the intraperitoneal administration of myricitrin caused significant inhibition of biting behaviour induced by i.t. injection of glutamate, substance P, capsaicin, interleukin 1 beta (IL-1beta) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). The antinociception caused by myricitrin in the acetic acid test was fully prevented by i.t. pre-treatment with pertussis toxin, a Gi/o protein inactivator, and by i.c.v. injection of calcium chloride (CaCl(2)). In addition, the i.t. pre-treatment of mice with apamin, a blocker of small (or low)-conductance calcium-gated K(+) channels and tetraethylammonium, a blocker of voltage-gated K(+) channels significantly reversed the antinociception induced by myricitrin. The charybdotoxin, a blocker of large (or fast)-conductance calcium-gated K(+) channels and glibenclamide, a blocker of the ATP-gated K(+) channels had no effect on myricitrin-induced antinociception. Calcium uptake analysis revealed that myricitrin inhibited (45)Ca(2+) influx under a K(+)-induced depolarization condition. However, calcium movement was modified in a non-depolarizing condition only when the highest concentration of myricitrin was used. In summary, our findings indicate that myricitrin produces consistent antinociception in chemical models of nociception in mice. These results clearly demonstrate an involvement of the Gi/o protein dependent mechanism on antinociception caused by myricitrin. The opening of voltage- and small-conductance calcium-gated K(+) channels and the reduction of calcium influx led to the antinociceptive of myricitrin.
Sethiya N, Ghiloria N, Srivastav A, Bisht D, Chaudhary S, Walia V CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2023; 23(7):865-882.
PMID: 37461364 DOI: 10.2174/1871527322666230718105358.
Study on the Material Basis of Neuroprotection of Bark.
Shen S, Zhao M, Li C, Chang Q, Liu X, Liao Y Molecules. 2019; 24(16).
PMID: 31426594 PMC: 6720352. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24162993.
Wang M, Sun G, Du Y, Tian Y, Liao P, Liu X Front Pharmacol. 2017; 8:353.
PMID: 28642708 PMC: 5462924. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00353.
Sun J, Sun G, Cui X, Meng X, Qin M, Sun X Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016; 2016:6093783.
PMID: 27703489 PMC: 5039279. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6093783.
Antinociceptive and anticonvulsant effects of the monoterpene linalool oxide.
Souto-Maior F, Fonseca D, Salgado P, Monte L, de Sousa D, de Almeida R Pharm Biol. 2016; 55(1):63-67.
PMID: 27622736 PMC: 7012048. DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2016.1228682.