» Articles » PMID: 17455281

Effect of Water Storage Time and Composite Cement Thickness on Fatigue of a Glass-ceramic Trilayer System

Overview
Date 2007 Apr 25
PMID 17455281
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Static Hertzian contact tests of monolayer glass-ceramics in trilayer configurations (glass-ceramic/cement/composite) have shown that thick cement layers lower strength. This study sought to test the hypothesis that thick resin cement layers lower mouth motion fatigue reliability for flat glass-ceramic/cement/composite trilayer systems and that aging in water reduces reliability.

Methods: Dicor plates (n > or = 12 per group) (10 x 10 x 0.8 mm(3)) were aluminum-oxide abraded (50 microm), etched (60 s), silanized, and bonded (Rely X ARC) to water aged (30 days) Z100 resin blocks (10 x 10 x 4 mm(3)). Four groups were prepared: (1) thick cement layer (>100 microm) stored in water for 24-48 h, (2) thick cement layer stored for 60 days, (3) thin cement layer (< or =100 microm) stored for 24-48 h, and (4) thin cement layer stored for 60 days. The layered structures were fatigued (2 Hz) utilizing mouth motion loading with a step-stress acceleration method. A master Weibull distribution was calculated and reliability determined (with 90% confidence intervals) at a given number of cycles and load.

Results: The aged group (60 d) with thick cement layer had statistically lower reliability for 20,000 cycles at 150 N peak load (0.11) compared with both nonaged groups (24-48 h) (thin layer = 0.90 and thick layer = 0.82) and aged group with thin cement layer (0.89).

Conclusion: Trilayer specimens with thick cement layers exhibited significantly lower reliability under fatigue testing only when stored for 60 days in water. The hypothesis was accepted. These results suggest that diffusion of water into the resin cement and also to the glass-ceramic interface is delayed in the thick cement specimens at 24-48 h. .

Citing Articles

CAD/CAM versus 3D-printing/pressed lithium disilicate monolithic crowns: Adaptation and fatigue behavior.

Ottoni R, Marocho S, Griggs J, Borba M J Dent. 2022; 123:104181.

PMID: 35679990 PMC: 11904409. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104181.


The marginal and internal discrepancy of zirconia coping milled by two computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing systems.

Urapepon S J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021; 21(2):192-197.

PMID: 33938870 PMC: 8262434. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_30_21.


Dentin to dentin adhesion using combinations of resin cements and adhesives from different manufacturers - a novel approach.

Seitz E, Hjortsjo C, Dahl J, Saxegaard E Biomater Investig Dent. 2020; 7(1):96-104.

PMID: 32939453 PMC: 7470095. DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1793677.


Fitting accuracy of ceramic veneered Co-Cr crowns produced by different manufacturing processes.

Freifrau von Maltzahn N, Bernhard F, Kohorst P J Adv Prosthodont. 2020; 12(2):100-106.

PMID: 32377323 PMC: 7183853. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.100.


Internal accuracy of digitally fabricated cross-arch yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline prosthesis.

Juntavee N, Sirisathit I Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018; 10:129-140.

PMID: 30022858 PMC: 6042495. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S168830.