» Articles » PMID: 17448883

Uncertainty Estimation in Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Absolute Dosimetry Verification

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2007 Apr 24
PMID 17448883
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) represents an important method for improving RT. The IMRT relative dosimetry checks are well established; however, open questions remain in reference dosimetry with ionization chambers (ICs). The main problem is the departure of the measurement conditions from the reference ones; thus, additional uncertainty is introduced into the dose determination. The goal of this study was to assess this effect systematically.

Methods And Materials: Monte Carlo calculations and dosimetric measurements with five different detectors were performed for a number of representative IMRT cases, covering both step-and-shoot and dynamic delivery.

Results: Using ICs with volumes of about 0.125 cm(3) or less, good agreement was observed among the detectors in most of the situations studied. These results also agreed well with the Monte Carlo-calculated nonreference correction factors (c factors). Additionally, we found a general correlation between the IC position relative to a segment and the derived correction factor c, which can be used to estimate the expected overall uncertainty of the treatment.

Conclusion: The increase of the reference dose relative standard uncertainty measured with ICs introduced by nonreference conditions when verifying an entire IMRT plan is about 1-1.5%, provided that appropriate small-volume chambers are used. The overall standard uncertainty of the measured IMRT dose amounts to about 2.3%, including the 0.5% of reproducibility and 1.5% of uncertainty associated with the beam calibration factor. Solid state detectors and large-volume chambers are not well suited to IMRT verification dosimetry because of the greater uncertainties. An action level of 5% is appropriate for IMRT verification. Greater discrepancies should lead to a review of the dosimetric procedure, including visual inspection of treatment segments and energy fluence.

Citing Articles

Modeling of a tissue expander with a radiofrequency identification port in postmastectomy radiation therapy planning.

Matsubayashi F, Takahashi T, Miyauchi H, Ito Y, Harada A, Yoshioka Y J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(3):360-368.

PMID: 38461548 PMC: 11115439. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae004.


Leaf-individual calibration for a double stack multileaf collimator in photon radiotherapy.

Rippke C, Renkamp C, Attieh C, Schluter F, Buchele C, Debus J Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 27:100477.

PMID: 37635846 PMC: 10457557. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100477.


Modeling Elekta VersaHD using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system for photon beams: A single-institution experience.

Zhang Y, Le A, Tian Z, Iqbal Z, Chiu T, Gu X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20(10):33-42.

PMID: 31471950 PMC: 6806469. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12709.


A method to improve fluence resolution derived from two-dimensional detector array measurements for patient-specific IMRT verification using the information collected in dynalog files.

Santiago J, Utrilla M, Rodriguez M J Med Phys. 2015; 40(1):5-12.

PMID: 26150681 PMC: 4471645. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.152231.


A systematic approach to statistical analysis in dosimetry and patient-specific IMRT plan verification measurements.

Qin S, Zhang M, Kim S, Chen T, Kim L, Haffty B Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:225.

PMID: 24074185 PMC: 3852372. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-225.