» Articles » PMID: 17440244

Viscoelasticity Imaging Using Ultrasound: Parameters and Error Analysis

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2007 Apr 19
PMID 17440244
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Techniques are being developed to image viscoelastic features of soft tissues from time-varying strain. A compress-hold-release stress stimulus commonly used in creep-recovery measurements is applied to samples to form images of elastic strain and strain retardance times. While the intended application is diagnostic breast imaging, results in gelatin hydrogels are presented to demonstrate the techniques. The spatiotemporal behaviour of gelatin is described by linear viscoelastic theory formulated for polymeric solids. Measured creep responses of polymers are frequently modelled as sums of exponentials whose time constants describe the delay or retardation of the full strain response. We found the spectrum of retardation times tau to be continuous and bimodal, where the amplitude at each tau represents the relative number of molecular bonds with a given strength and conformation. Such spectra indicate that the molecular weight of the polymer fibres between bonding points is large. Imaging parameters are found by summarizing these complex spectral distributions at each location in the medium with a second-order Voigt rheological model. This simplification reduces the dimensionality of the data for selecting imaging parameters while preserving essential information on how the creeping deformation describes fluid flow and collagen matrix restructuring in the medium. The focus of this paper is on imaging parameter estimation from ultrasonic echo data, and how jitter from hand-held force applicators used for clinical applications propagate through the imaging chain to generate image noise.

Citing Articles

Prostate Cancer Detection Using 3-D Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.

Morris D, Chan D, Palmeri M, Polascik T, Foo W, Nightingale K Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021; 47(7):1670-1680.

PMID: 33832823 PMC: 8169635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.02.006.


Multi-parameter Sub-Hertz Analysis of Viscoelasticity With a Quality Metric for Differentiation of Breast Masses.

Bayat M, Nabavizadeh A, Nayak R, Webb J, Gregory A, Meixner D Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020; 46(12):3393-3403.

PMID: 32917470 PMC: 7606763. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.08.004.


Why Are Viscosity and Nonlinearity Bound to Make an Impact in Clinical Elastographic Diagnosis?.

Rus G, Faris I, Torres J, Callejas A, Melchor J Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(8).

PMID: 32331295 PMC: 7219338. DOI: 10.3390/s20082379.


Study on the Viscoelasticity Measurement of Materials Based on Surface Reflected Waves.

Chang J, Li Y, Zeng X, Zhong H, Wan T, Lu C Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(11).

PMID: 31185661 PMC: 6601282. DOI: 10.3390/ma12111875.


Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra- low frequency range.

Nabavizadeh A, Bayat M, Kumar V, Gregory A, Webb J, Alizad A Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):5737.

PMID: 30952880 PMC: 6450913. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41885-9.


References
1.
Ashfaq M, Brunke S, Dahl J, Ermert H, Hansen C, Insana M . An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006; 53(10):1759-71. DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2006.109. View

2.
Greenleaf J, Fatemi M, Insana M . Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003; 5:57-78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.5.040202.121623. View

3.
Chaturvedi P, Insana M, Hall T . Testing the limitations of 2-D companding for strain imaging using phantoms. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008; 45(4):1022-31. DOI: 10.1109/58.710585. View

4.
Stoeckelhuber M, Stumpf P, Hoefter E, Welsch U . Proteoglycan-collagen associations in the non-lactating human breast connective tissue during the menstrual cycle. Histochem Cell Biol. 2002; 118(3):221-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00418-002-0438-7. View

5.
Fatemi M, Greenleaf J . Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustic spectrography. Science. 1998; 280(5360):82-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.280.5360.82. View