» Articles » PMID: 17402812

Item Factor Analysis: Current Approaches and Future Directions

Overview
Journal Psychol Methods
Specialty Psychology
Date 2007 Apr 4
PMID 17402812
Citations 208
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rationale underlying factor analysis applies to continuous and categorical variables alike; however, the models and estimation methods for continuous (i.e., interval or ratio scale) data are not appropriate for item-level data that are categorical in nature. The authors provide a targeted review and synthesis of the item factor analysis (IFA) estimation literature for ordered-categorical data (e.g., Likert-type response scales) with specific attention paid to the problems of estimating models with many items and many factors. Popular IFA models and estimation methods found in the structural equation modeling and item response theory literatures are presented. Following this presentation, recent developments in the estimation of IFA parameters (e.g., Markov chain Monte Carlo) are discussed. The authors conclude with considerations for future research on IFA, simulated examples, and advice for applied researchers.

Citing Articles

Adherence to a digital therapeutic mediates the relationship between momentary self-regulation and health risk behaviors.

Plaitano E, McNeish D, Bartels S, Bell K, Dallery J, Grabinski M Front Digit Health. 2025; 7:1467772.

PMID: 39981105 PMC: 11841403. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1467772.


Exposome Burden Scores to Summarize Environmental Chemical Mixtures: Creating a Fair and Common Scale for Cross-study Harmonization, Report-back and Precision Environmental Health.

Liu S, Manz K, Buckley J, Feuerstahler L Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025; 12(1):13.

PMID: 39964568 DOI: 10.1007/s40572-024-00467-2.


Reliability representativeness: How well does coefficient alpha summarize reliability across the score distribution?.

McNeish D, Dumas D Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(3):93.

PMID: 39930303 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-025-02611-8.


Factor Retention in Exploratory Multidimensional Item Response Theory.

Chen C, Dhondt R, Vens C, Van Den Noortgate W Educ Psychol Meas. 2025; :00131644241306680.

PMID: 39759538 PMC: 11699551. DOI: 10.1177/00131644241306680.


Data-driven vs. psychological personality temperaments: theoretical and clinical utility of personality measures in psychiatry.

Sawalma A, Sehwail M, Dammers J, Herzallah M Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1436121.

PMID: 39713772 PMC: 11663214. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436121.


References
1.
Flora D, Curran P . An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004; 9(4):466-91. PMC: 3153362. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466. View

2.
Cai L, Maydeu-Olivares A, Coffman D, Thissen D . Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006; 59(Pt 1):173-94. DOI: 10.1348/000711005X66419. View

3.
METROPOLIS N, ULAM S . The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949; 44(247):335-41. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310. View

4.
Geman S, Geman D . Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2012; 6(6):721-41. DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596. View

5.
Joreskog K, Moustaki I . Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparison of Three Approaches. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 36(3):347-87. DOI: 10.1207/S15327906347-387. View