» Articles » PMID: 17375286

Strong Mutagenic Effects of Diesel Engine Emissions Using Vegetable Oil As Fuel

Overview
Journal Arch Toxicol
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2007 Mar 22
PMID 17375286
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diesel engine emissions (DEE) are classified as probably carcinogenic to humans. In recent years every effort was made to reduce DEE and their content of carcinogenic and mutagenic polycyclic aromatic compounds. Since 1995 we observed an appreciable reduction of mutagenicity of DEE driven by reformulated or newly designed fuels in several studies. Recently, the use of rapeseed oil as fuel for diesel engines is rapidly growing among German transportation businesses and agriculture due to economic reasons. We compared the mutagenic effects of DEE from two different batches of rapeseed oil (RSO) with rapeseed methyl ester (RME, biodiesel), natural gas derived synthetic fuel (gas-to-liquid, GTL), and a reference diesel fuel (DF). The test engine was a heavy-duty truck diesel running the European Stationary Cycle. Particulate matter from the exhaust was sampled onto PTFE-coated glass fibre filters and extracted with dichloromethane in a soxhlet apparatus. The gas phase constituents were sampled as condensates. The mutagenicity of the particle extracts and the condensates was tested using the Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsome assay with tester strains TA98 and TA100. Compared to DF the two RSO qualities significantly increased the mutagenic effects of the particle extracts by factors of 9.7 up to 59 in tester strain TA98 and of 5.4 up to 22.3 in tester strain TA100, respectively. The condensates of the RSO fuels caused an up to factor 13.5 stronger mutagenicity than the reference fuel. RME extracts had a moderate but significant higher mutagenic response in assays of TA98 with metabolic activation and TA100 without metabolic activation. GTL samples did not differ significantly from DF. In conclusion, the strong increase of mutagenicity using RSO as diesel fuel compared to the reference DF and other fuels causes deep concern on future usage of this biologic resource as a replacement of established diesel fuels.

Citing Articles

Temperature and Driving Cycle Significantly Affect Carbonaceous Gas and Particle Matter Emissions from Diesel Trucks.

Hays M, Preston W, George B, George I, Snow R, Faircloth J Energy Fuels. 2020; 31(10).

PMID: 32461712 PMC: 7252512. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01446.


Effect of biodiesel on PAH, OPAH, and NPAH emissions from a direct injection diesel engine.

Li X, Zheng Y, Guan C, Cheung C, Huang Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018; 25(34):34131-34138.

PMID: 30284708 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3382-3.


Cytotoxicity of Air Pollutant 9,10-Phenanthrenequinone: Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and Redox Signaling.

Yang M, Ahmed H, Wu W, Jiang B, Jia Z Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:9523968.

PMID: 29984252 PMC: 6015725. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9523968.


A comparative analysis of in vitro toxicity of diesel exhaust particles from combustion of 1st- and 2nd-generation biodiesel fuels in relation to their physicochemical properties-the FuelHealth project.

Lankoff A, Brzoska K, Czarnocka J, Kowalska M, Lisowska H, Mruk R Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 24(23):19357-19374.

PMID: 28674953 PMC: 5556143. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9561-9.


Comparative cardiopulmonary toxicity of exhausts from soy-based biofuels and diesel in healthy and hypertensive rats.

Bass V, Schladweiler M, Nyska A, Thomas R, Miller D, Krantz T Inhal Toxicol. 2015; 27(11):545-56.

PMID: 26514782 PMC: 4768834. DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2015.1060279.